Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35361908›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2022

Global phylogenetic analysis reveals multiple origins and correlates of genital mutilation/cutting.

Gabriel Šaffa, Jan Zrzavý, Pavel Duda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gendered conflict in the human family.Evolutionary human sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Origins of genital mutilation/cutting.Nature human behaviour · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriel ŠaffaDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czechia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2618-6424
Jan ZrzavýDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czechia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-5855
Pavel DudaDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czechia. dudapa01@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-2468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genital mutilation/cutting is costly in terms of health, survival and reproduction, and the long-term maintenance of these practices is an evolutionary conundrum. Previous studies have suggested a mate-guarding function or various signalling functions of genital mutilation/cutting. Here we use phylogenetic comparative methods and two global ethnographic samples to study the origins and socio-ecological correlates of major types of female and male genital mutilation/cutting. Male genital mutilation/cutting probably originated in polygynous societies with separate residence of co-wives, supporting a mate-guarding function. Female genital mutilation/cutting originated subsequently and almost exclusively in societies already practising male genital mutilation/cutting, where it may have become a signal of chastity. Both have originated multiple times, some as early as in the mid-Holocene (5,000-7,000 years ago), considerably predating the earliest archaeological evidence and written records. Genital mutilation/cutting co-evolves with and may help maintain fundamental social structures, hindering efforts to change these cultural practices.

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleFemaleGenitaliaHumansMaleMarriagePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID35361908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.