Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35361869›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Investigation of biocidal efficacy of commercial disinfectants used in public, private and workplaces during the pandemic event of SARS-CoV-2.

Annalisa Ambrosino, Concetta Pironti, Federica Dell'Annunziata, Rosa Giugliano, Annalisa Chianese, Giuseppina Moccia, Francesco DeCaro, Massimiliano Galdiero, Gianluigi Franci, Oriana Motta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Annalisa Ambrosino *Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Maria di Costantinopoli, 16 80138, Naples, Italy.
Concetta Pironti *Department of Medicine Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy.
Federica Dell'AnnunziataDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Maria di Costantinopoli, 16 80138, Naples, Italy.
Rosa GiuglianoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Maria di Costantinopoli, 16 80138, Naples, Italy.
Annalisa ChianeseDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Maria di Costantinopoli, 16 80138, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppina MocciaDepartment of Medicine Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy.
Francesco DeCaroDepartment of Medicine Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy.
Massimiliano GaldieroDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Maria di Costantinopoli, 16 80138, Naples, Italy.
Gianluigi FranciDepartment of Medicine Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy.
Oriana MottaDepartment of Medicine Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy. omotta@unisa.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the performance of 24 commercial disinfectants present on the market during last year according to the manufacturer's instructions. Recently, national and international organizations of public health performed studies on disinfection products due to the increasing awareness of the potential and growing risks on human health, such as skin damage and reactions in the mucosal lining, especially for the healthcare workers in their frequent daily use. However, there are many limitations in the common cleaning/disinfection products on market as in the selection of effective disinfectants to decontaminate inanimate surfaces. We analyzed the disinfection power of hydrogen peroxide, quaternary ammonium compounds, alcohols, phenols and aldehydes used as active principles according to international guidelines. The antimicrobial properties were assessed by broth microdilution, and antibiofilm properties against Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus); their virucidal efficacy was tested against Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The quaternary ammonium compounds demonstrated better efficacy than others and in some cases ready to use products had also virucidal and antimicrobial activities after dilution at 0.125%. The scientific evidence indicates that many commercial products are used at high concentrations and high doses and this could have deleterious effects both on human health and the environment. A lower concentration of active ingredients would avoid the excessive release of chemicals into the environment and improve skin tolerance, ensuring the health and safety protection of workers, including the healthcare operators at their workplace.

Indexed as

COVID-19DisinfectantsEscherichia coliHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Staphylococcus aureusWorkplaceDisinfectants

Identifiers

PMID35361869
PMCPMC8969816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.