Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35361850›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A greedy regression algorithm with coarse weights offers novel advantages.

Clark D Jeffries, John R Ford, Jeffrey L Tilson, Diana O Perkins, Darius M Bost, Dayne L Filer, Kirk C Wilhelmsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clark D JeffriesRenaissance Computing Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. clark_jeffries@med.unc.edu.
John R FordPerspectrix, Pittsboro, NC, USA.
Jeffrey L TilsonRenaissance Computing Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Diana O PerkinsPsychiatry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Darius M BostRenaissance Computing Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Dayne L FilerRenaissance Computing Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kirk C WilhelmsenRenaissance Computing Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

5/9 Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH082004 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PERKINS, DIANA O. · 2008 to 2018
$7.5M
NIMH NIH HHS MH082004NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH082004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regularized regression analysis is a mature analytic approach to identify weighted sums of variables predicting outcomes. We present a novel Coarse Approximation Linear Function (CALF) to frugally select important predictors and build simple but powerful predictive models. CALF is a linear regression strategy applied to normalized data that uses nonzero weights + 1 or - 1. Qualitative (linearly invariant) metrics to be optimized can be (for binary response) Welch (Student) t-test p-value or area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic, or (for real response) Pearson correlation. Predictor weighting is critically important when developing risk prediction models. While counterintuitive, it is a fact that qualitative metrics can favor CALF with ± 1 weights over algorithms producing real number weights. Moreover, while regression methods may be expected to change most or all weight values upon even small changes in input data (e.g., discarding a single subject of hundreds) CALF weights generally do not so change. Similarly, some regression methods applied to collinear or nearly collinear variables yield unpredictable magnitude or the direction (in p-space) of the weights as a vector. In contrast, with CALF if some predictors are linearly dependent or nearly so, CALF simply chooses at most one (the most informative, if any) and ignores the others, thus avoiding the inclusion of two or more collinear variables in the model.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveHumansLinear ModelsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID35361850
PMCPMC8971398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.