ArticleScientific reports2022
A machine learning model to estimate myocardial stiffness from EDPVR.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical-medical convergence in heart failure: Artificial intelligence, finite-element modeling, and 3D printing for diagnosis and prognosis.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- ANN-PSO Hybrid ML-Optimization of a Hollow-Disk Resonator-Based Photonic Crystal Optical Sensor for HeLa Cell Tumor Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimal design for multi-compartment cell elasticity estimation using AFM and super-resolution imaging.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Computational Modeling Meets 3D Bioprinting: Emerging Synergies in Cardiovascular Disease Modeling.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Towards fully automated synthetic ECV quantification: an open-access machine learning-based approach for fast blood draw-free CMR.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Translating Mechanistic Insights Into Action and Revealing New Pathways: Machine Learning Approaches in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Comparison of noninvasive pressure-volume loops derived from cardiac magnetic resonance and transthoracic echocardiography in normal subjects.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted multiscale lung modeling to predict alveolar septal wall stress.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Regional heterogeneity in left atrial stiffness impacts passive deformation in a cohort of patient-specific models.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- A multi-scale finite element method for investigating fiber remodeling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Complete spatiotemporal quantification of cardiac motion in mice through multi-view magnetic resonance imaging and super-resolution reconstruction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Non-invasive pressure-volume loop derived temporal elastance, contractility, and efficiency indices for assessing Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients.Heart and vessels · 2025Article
- Distinguishing shear and tensile myocardial wall stiffness using ex vivo anisotropic Magnetic Resonance Elastography.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Chronic Myocardial Infarction via Composite In-Silico-Human Data Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Prognostic impact of left ventricular reverse remodeling after surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing cardiac disease detection via a fusion of machine learning and medical imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Based Estimation of Myocardial Material Parameters from Cardiac MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Neural Network Finite Element Trileaflet Heart Valve Model Incorporating Multi-Body Contact.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Right Ventricular Stiffening and Anisotropy Alterations in Pulmonary Hypertension: Mechanisms and Relations to Right Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Mechano-electrical-fluid interaction left-ventricle model for numerical evaluation of aortic valve hemodynamics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In-vivo estimation of mechanical properties of the myocardium is essential for patient-specific diagnosis and prognosis of cardiac disease involving myocardial remodeling, including myocardial infarction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Current approaches use time-consuming finite-element (FE) inverse methods that involve reconstructing and meshing the heart geometry, imposing measured loading, and conducting computationally expensive iterative FE simulations. In this paper, we propose a machine learning (ML) model that feasibly and accurately predicts passive myocardial properties directly from select geometric, architectural, and hemodynamic measures, thus bypassing exhaustive steps commonly required in cardiac FE inverse problems. Geometric and fiber-orientation features were chosen to be readily obtainable from standard cardiac imaging protocols. The end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR), which can be obtained using a single-point pressure-volume measurement, was used as a hemodynamic (loading) feature. A comprehensive ML training dataset in the geometry-architecture-loading space was generated, including a wide variety of partially synthesized rodent heart geometry and myofiber helicity possibilities, and a broad range of EDPVRs obtained using forward FE simulations. Latin hypercube sampling was used to create 2500 examples for training, validation, and testing. A multi-layer feed-forward neural network (MFNN) was used as a deep learning agent to train the ML model. The model showed excellent performance in predicting stiffness parameters [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] associated with fiber direction ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]). After conducting permutation feature importance analysis, the ML performance further improved for [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]), and the left ventricular volume and endocardial area were found to be the most critical geometric features for accurate predictions. The ML model predictions were evaluated further in two cases: (i) rat-specific stiffness data measured using ex-vivo mechanical testing, and (ii) patient-specific estimation using FE inverse modeling. Excellent agreements with ML predictions were found for both cases. The trained ML model offers a feasible technology to estimate patient-specific myocardial properties, thus, bridging the gap between EDPVR, as a confounded organ-level metric for tissue stiffness, and intrinsic tissue-level properties. These properties provide incremental information relative to traditional organ-level indices for cardiac function, improving the clinical assessment and prognosis of cardiac diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.