Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35361836›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A machine learning model to estimate myocardial stiffness from EDPVR.

Hamed Babaei, Emilio A Mendiola, Sunder Neelakantan, Qian Xiang, Alexander Vang, Richard A F Dixon, Dipan J Shah, Peter Vanderslice, Gaurav Choudhary, Reza Avazmohammadi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Neural Network Finite Element Trileaflet Heart Valve Model Incorporating Multi-Body Contact.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hamed BabaeiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Emilio A MendiolaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Sunder NeelakantanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Qian XiangDepartment of Molecular Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Alexander VangProvidence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, 02908, USA.
Richard A F DixonDepartment of Molecular Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Dipan J ShahHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Peter VandersliceDepartment of Molecular Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Gaurav ChoudharyProvidence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, 02908, USA.
Reza AvazmohammadiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. rezaavaz@tamu.edu.
Texas A&M University · USBrown University · USHouston Methodist · USProvidence VA Medical Center · USWalker (United States) · US

Funding

Role of Endothelial Anoctamin-1 in Pulmonary Arterial HypertensionR01HL148727 · NHLBI · OCEAN STATE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CHOUDHARY, GAURAV · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors and RV Dysfunction in Pulmonary HypertensionR01HL128661 · NHLBI · OCEAN STATE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CHOUDHARY, GAURAV · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
The effect of systemic hypertension on prognosis of myocardial infarction: Understanding, prediction and therapy evaluationR00HL138288 · NHLBI · TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION · PI AVAZMOHAMMADI, REZA · 2020 to 2022
$727k
Role of Skeletal Muscle Mitochondrial Supercomplexes in Exercise IntoleranceI01CX001892 · VA · PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHOUDHARY, GAURAV · 2019 to 2022
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001892NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL138288NHLBI NIH HHS R00HL138288NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128661NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL128661NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148727VA I01CX001892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-vivo estimation of mechanical properties of the myocardium is essential for patient-specific diagnosis and prognosis of cardiac disease involving myocardial remodeling, including myocardial infarction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Current approaches use time-consuming finite-element (FE) inverse methods that involve reconstructing and meshing the heart geometry, imposing measured loading, and conducting computationally expensive iterative FE simulations. In this paper, we propose a machine learning (ML) model that feasibly and accurately predicts passive myocardial properties directly from select geometric, architectural, and hemodynamic measures, thus bypassing exhaustive steps commonly required in cardiac FE inverse problems. Geometric and fiber-orientation features were chosen to be readily obtainable from standard cardiac imaging protocols. The end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR), which can be obtained using a single-point pressure-volume measurement, was used as a hemodynamic (loading) feature. A comprehensive ML training dataset in the geometry-architecture-loading space was generated, including a wide variety of partially synthesized rodent heart geometry and myofiber helicity possibilities, and a broad range of EDPVRs obtained using forward FE simulations. Latin hypercube sampling was used to create 2500 examples for training, validation, and testing. A multi-layer feed-forward neural network (MFNN) was used as a deep learning agent to train the ML model. The model showed excellent performance in predicting stiffness parameters [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] associated with fiber direction ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]). After conducting permutation feature importance analysis, the ML performance further improved for [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]), and the left ventricular volume and endocardial area were found to be the most critical geometric features for accurate predictions. The ML model predictions were evaluated further in two cases: (i) rat-specific stiffness data measured using ex-vivo mechanical testing, and (ii) patient-specific estimation using FE inverse modeling. Excellent agreements with ML predictions were found for both cases. The trained ML model offers a feasible technology to estimate patient-specific myocardial properties, thus, bridging the gap between EDPVR, as a confounded organ-level metric for tissue stiffness, and intrinsic tissue-level properties. These properties provide incremental information relative to traditional organ-level indices for cardiac function, improving the clinical assessment and prognosis of cardiac diseases.

Indexed as

Heart FailureMyocardiumAnimalsHeartHeart VentriclesHumansMachine LearningRats

Identifiers

PMID35361836
PMCPMC8971532
OpenAlexW4220965910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.