Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35361769›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2022

Associations with response to Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

A Desnoyers, M Nadler, B E Wilson, S Stajer, E Amir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. GermlineCancers · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

A DesnoyersDivision of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1458-2959
M NadlerDivision of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
B E WilsonDivision of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
S StajerDivision of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
E AmirDivision of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. eitan.amir@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3706-525X
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have modest antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer and mutation in BRCA. It is unclear whether some subgroups derive greater benefit from treatment. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2021 to identify trials of PARPi in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) to PARPi were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis using the Mantel Haenszel random effects model. Meta-regression explored the influence of patient and tumor characteristics on ORR and CBR. For randomized trials, hazard ratio comparing PARPi to control therapy were pooled using inverse variance and random effects. Analysis included 43 studies comprising 2409 patients. Among these, 1798 (75%) patients had BRCA mutations and 1146 (48%) were triple negative. In 10 studies (28%; n = 680 patients), the PARPi was given in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. Weighted mean ORR was 45%; 64% when combined with platinum vs 37% with PARPi monotherapy (p < 0.001). Previous platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with lower ORR (p = 0.02). Compared to standard chemotherapy, progression-free survival was improved (HR 0.64, p < 0.001), but there was no difference in overall survival (HR 0.87, p = 0.06). There were no differences in ORR or CBR between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. PARPi are more active in combination with platinum than as monotherapy, with lower response if given as monotherapy after platinum exposure. Significant improvements in ORR translated to modest improvement in progression-free, but not overall survival. There was no association between ORR and BRCA mutations.

Identifiers

PMID35361769
PMCPMC8971397
OpenAlexW4220913811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.