Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35361633›Full record

ReviewThe European respiratory journal2022

Asthma remission: what is it and how can it be achieved?

Dennis Thomas, Vanessa M McDonald, Ian D Pavord, Peter G Gibson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European respiratory journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07508280 (Effects of Energy Conservation Exercises Versus Circuit Training on Dyspnea, Functional Capacity and Quality of Life in Asthmatic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 138 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed
25.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07508280 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Energy Conservation Exercises Versus Circuit Training on Dyspnea, Functional Capacity and Quality of Life in Asthmatic Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled32ConditionsAsthmaArmsEnergy Conservation Technique, Circuit Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Early response toward clinical remission with dupilumab in severe asthma: Real-world cohort.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. A circulating odd-chain fatty acid biomarker signature discriminates pediatric allergic rhinitis with asthma from related allergic airway phenotypes.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dennis ThomasPriority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4182-6821
Vanessa M McDonaldPriority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9890-3408
Ian D PavordOxford Respiratory NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Dept of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4288-5973
Peter G GibsonPriority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia peter.gibson@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5865-489X
John Hunter Hospital · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asthma treatment goals currently focus on symptom and exacerbation control rather than remission. Remission is not identical to cure, but is a step closer. This review considers the current definitions of remission in asthma, the prevalence and predictors, the pathophysiology of remission, the possibility of achieving it using the available treatment options, and the future research directions. Asthma remission is characterised by a high level of disease control, including the absence of symptoms and exacerbations, and normalisation or optimisation of lung function with or without ongoing treatment. Even in those who develop a symptomatic remission of asthma, persistent pathological abnormalities are common, leading to a risk of subsequent relapse at any time. Complete remission requires normalisation or stabilisation of any underlying pathology in addition to symptomatic remission. Remission is possible as part of the natural history of asthma, and the prevalence of remission in the adult asthma population varies between 2% and 52%. The factors associated with remission include mild asthma, better lung function, better asthma control, younger age, early-onset asthma, shorter duration of asthma, milder bronchial hyperresponsiveness, fewer comorbidities and smoking cessation or never smoking. Although previous studies have not targeted treatment-induced remission, there is some evidence to show that the current long-term add-on therapies such as biologics and azithromycin can achieve some criteria for asthma remission on treatment, at least in a subgroup of patients. However, more research is required. Long-term remission could be included as a therapeutic goal in studies of asthma treatments.

Indexed as

AsthmaBronchial HyperreactivityAdultChronic DiseaseHumansRemission InductionTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID35361633
PMCPMC9630609
OpenAlexW4220906590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.