Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35361419›Full record

ArticleAnalytica chimica acta2022

Development of a solid phase microextraction gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methodology for the analysis of sixty personal care products in hydroalcoholic gels - hand sanitizers - in the context of COVID-19 pandemic.

Lua Vazquez, Maria Celeiro, Ana Castiñeira-Landeira, Thierry Dagnac, Maria Llompart

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytica chimica acta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mass-Spectrometry-Based Research of Cosmetic Ingredients.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lua VazquezCRETUS, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Science, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Maria CeleiroCRETUS, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Science, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Ana Castiñeira-LandeiraCRETUS, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Science, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Thierry DagnacGalician Agency for Food Quality - Agronomic Research Centre (AGACAL-CIAM) - Unit of Organic Contaminants, Apartado 10, E-15080, A Coruña, Spain.
Maria LlompartCRETUS, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Science, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Electronic address: maria.llompart@usc.es.
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESAndalusian Agency for Healthcare Quality · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the coronavirus pandemic, hydroalcoholic gels have become essential products to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This research aims to develop a simple, fast and sustainable microextraction methodology followed by gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) to analyze simultaneously 60 personal care products (PCPs) including fragrances allergens, synthetic musks, preservatives and plasticizers in hand sanitizers. Micro-matrix-solid-phase dispersion (μMSPD) and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) were compared with the aim of obtaining high sensitivity and sample throughput. SPME demonstrated higher efficiency being selected as sample treatment. Different dilutions of the sample in ultrapure water were assessed to achieve high sensitivity but, at the same time, to avoid or minimize matrix effect. The most critical parameters affecting SPME (fibre coating, extraction mode and temperature) were optimized by design of experiments (DOE). The method was successfully validated in terms of linearity, precision and accuracy, obtaining recovery values between 80 and 112% for most compounds with relative standard deviation (RSD) values lower than 10%. External calibration using standards prepared in ultrapure water demonstrated suitability due to the absence of matrix effect. Finally, the simple, fast and high throughput method was applied to the analysis of real hydroalcoholic gel samples. Among the 60 target compounds, 39 of them were found, highlighting the high number of fragrance allergens, at concentrations ranging between 0.01 and 217 μg g

Indexed as

CosmeticsCOVID-19Hand SanitizersGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryGelsHumansPandemicsSolid Phase MicroextractionTandem Mass SpectrometryCosmeticsGelsHand SanitizersExperimental designFragrance allergensGas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometryHydroalcoholic gelsPersonal care productsSolid-phase microextraction

Identifiers

PMID35361419
PMCPMC8902396
OpenAlexW4220820067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.