Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35361273›Full record

ArticleEye and vision (London, England)2022

Intense pulsed light-based treatment for the improvement of symptoms in glaucoma patients treated with hypotensive eye drops.

Jose Maria Martinez-de-la-Casa, Carlos Oribio-Quinto, Almudena Milans-Del-Bosch, Pilar Perez-Garcia, Laura Morales-Fernandez, Javier Garcia-Bella, Jose Manuel Benitez-Del-Castillo, Julian Garcia-Feijoo, David P Piñero

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye and vision (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jose Maria Martinez-de-la-Casa *Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology and ORL, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Clinico San-Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clinico San-Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain. jmmartinezcasa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9441-0542
Carlos Oribio-Quinto *Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology and ORL, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Clinico San-Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clinico San-Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Almudena Milans-Del-BoschOphthalmology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology and ORL, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Clinico San-Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clinico San-Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Pilar Perez-GarciaOphthalmology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology and ORL, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Clinico San-Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clinico San-Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Laura Morales-FernandezOphthalmology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology and ORL, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Clinico San-Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clinico San-Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Garcia-BellaOphthalmology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology and ORL, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Clinico San-Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clinico San-Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Jose Manuel Benitez-Del-CastilloOphthalmology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology and ORL, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Clinico San-Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clinico San-Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Julian Garcia-FeijooOphthalmology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology and ORL, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Clinico San-Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clinico San-Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
David P PiñeroDepartment of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversity of Alicante · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOcular surface disease in glaucoma patients is a significant ocular co-morbidity that can affect 40% to 59% of these patients worldwide. The current study was aimed at evaluating the potential clinical benefit of an intense pulsed light (IPL)-based treatment in glaucomatous patients with ocular surface disease due to prolonged hypotensive eyedrop treatments. To our knowledge, this is the first series analyzing the therapeutic effect of this treatment option in this type of patients.

methodsThis non-comparative prospective case series study enrolled a total of 30 glaucoma patients ranging in age from 57 to 94 years old and treated with hypotensive eyedrops for years with dry eye symptomatology. All patients received four sessions of IPL treatment using the Optima IPL system (Lumenis, Yokneam, Israel) adjusted to the official optimized Lumenis setting. Changes in symptomatology, corneal staining, conjunctival hyperemia, non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), tear osmolarity, tear meniscus height (TMH), meiboscore and meibomian gland expressibility was analyzed after treatment.

resultsStatistically significant reductions were observed after IPL treatment in the symptomatology scores measured with different questionnaires [ocular surface disease index (OSDI), standard patient evaluation of eye dryness (SPEED) and symptom assessment questionnaire in dry eye (SANDE)] as well as with the visual analogue scale (P < 0.001). Mean change in OSDI was - 15.0 ± 11.3. A significant reduction was found after treatment in the corneal staining score (P < 0.001). A significant reduction was found in tear film meniscus height (P = 0.012), as well as in tear film osmolarity (P = 0.001). A significant reduction was also found in meibomian gland expressibility (P = 0.003), changing the percentage of grade 3 eyes from 44.4% before IPL to 17.2% after treatment.

conclusionsIPL therapy combined with meibomian gland expression (MGX) seems to be an effective option to improve symptomatology in glaucomatous patients with ocular surface disease due to prolonged hypotensive eyedrop treatments, with an additional improvement in clinical signs, such as tear osmolarity and corneal staining.

Indexed as

Dry eyeGlaucomaIntense pulsed lightMeibomian glands

Identifiers

PMID35361273
PMCPMC8973810
OpenAlexW4220966172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.