Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35361256›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

Prime-seq, efficient and powerful bulk RNA sequencing.

Aleksandar Janjic, Lucas E Wange, Johannes W Bagnoli, Johanna Geuder, Phong Nguyen, Daniel Richter, Beate Vieth, Binje Vick, Irmela Jeremias, Christoph Ziegenhain and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Decoding Human Placental Cellular and Molecular Responses to Obesity and Fetal Growth.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aleksandar Janjic *Anthropology & Human Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Lucas E Wange *Anthropology & Human Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Johannes W BagnoliAnthropology & Human Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Johanna GeuderAnthropology & Human Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Phong NguyenAnthropology & Human Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Daniel RichterAnthropology & Human Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Beate ViethAnthropology & Human Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Binje VickResearch Unit Apoptosis in Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (HMGU), Munich, Germany.
Irmela JeremiasResearch Unit Apoptosis in Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (HMGU), Munich, Germany.
Christoph ZiegenhainDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ines HellmannAnthropology & Human Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Wolfgang EnardAnthropology & Human Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany. enard@bio.lmu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4056-0550

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cost-efficient library generation by early barcoding has been central in propelling single-cell RNA sequencing. Here, we optimize and validate prime-seq, an early barcoding bulk RNA-seq method. We show that it performs equivalently to TruSeq, a standard bulk RNA-seq method, but is fourfold more cost-efficient due to almost 50-fold cheaper library costs. We also validate a direct RNA isolation step, show that intronic reads are derived from RNA, and compare cost-efficiencies of available protocols. We conclude that prime-seq is currently one of the best options to set up an early barcoding bulk RNA-seq protocol from which many labs would profit.

Indexed as

RNABase SequenceExome SequencingGene LibrarySequence Analysis, RNARNAGenomicsPower analysisRNA-seqTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID35361256
PMCPMC8969310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.