Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35361124›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2022

Preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Wongsaput Boonyakiatwattana, Adisak Maneesai, Vithaya Chaithiraphan, Decho Jakrapanichakul, Pranya Sakiyalak, Narathip Chunhamaneewat, Worawong Slisatkorn, Chunhakasem Chotinaiwattarakul, Rungtiwa Pongakasira, Nattawut Wongpraparut

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Conduction Disorders: The Achilles' Heel of TAVR?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of prosthesis oversizing on clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a self-expandable Evolut R valve.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wongsaput BoonyakiatwattanaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Adisak ManeesaiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Vithaya ChaithiraphanFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Her Majesty's Cardiac Center, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Decho JakrapanichakulDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Pranya SakiyalakDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narathip ChunhamaneewatDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Worawong SlisatkornDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chunhakasem ChotinaiwattarakulFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Her Majesty's Cardiac Center, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rungtiwa PongakasiraFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Her Majesty's Cardiac Center, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nattawut WongpraparutDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. wongpraparut@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1541-3313
Siriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConduction disturbances are a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim of this study was to investigate the preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances post-TAVR (hereafter CD/CDs).

methodsConsecutive patients who underwent TAVR during December 2009-March 2021 at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University-Thailand's largest national tertiary referral center-were enrolled. Patients with prior implantation of a cardiac device, periprocedural death, or unsuccessful procedure were excluded. Clinical and electrocardiographic data, preprocedural imaging, including membranous septum (MS) length, and procedural variables, including implantation depth (ID), were analyzed. CD was defined as new left or right bundle branch block, significant intraventricular conduction disturbance with QRS interval ≥ 120 ms, new high-grade atrioventricular block, or complete heart block. Multivariate binary logistic analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to identify independent predictors and the optimal ∆MSID (difference between the MS length and ID) cutoff value, respectively.

resultsA total of 124 TAVR patients (mean age: 84.3 ± 6.3 years, 62.1% female) were included. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 7.3%, and 85% of patients received a balloon expandable transcatheter heart valve. Thirty-five patients (28.2%) experienced a CD, and one-third of those required pacemaker implantation. The significant preprocedural and procedural factors identified from univariate analysis included intraventricular conduction delay, mitral annular calcification, MS length ≤ 6.43 mm, self-expanding device, small left ventricular cavity, and ID ≥ 6 mm. Multivariate analysis revealed MS length ≤ 6.43 mm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.54; 95% CI 2.56-35.47; p = 0.001) and ∆MSID < 0 mm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 10.77; 95% CI 2.86-40.62; p =  < 0.001) to be independent predictors of CD. The optimal ∆MSID cutoff value for predicting conduction disturbances was less than 0 mm (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AuROC]: 0.896).

conclusionThis study identified MS length ≤ 6.43 mm and ∆MSID < 0 mm as independent predictors of CDs. ∆MSID < 0 was the strongest and only modifiable predictor. Importantly, we expanded the CD criteria to cover all spectrum of TAVR-related conduction injury to lower the threshold of this sole modifiable risk. The optimal ∆MSID cutoff value was < 0 mm.

trial registrationTCTR, TCTR20210818002. Registered 17 August 2021-Retrospectively registered, http://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR 20210818002.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisPacemaker, ArtificialTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overBundle-Branch BlockFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeNew-onset conduction disturbancesPredictPreprocedural and procedural variablesTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Identifiers

PMID35361124
PMCPMC8974214
OpenAlexW4220759488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.