Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35360879›Full record

ReviewAlcohol research : current reviews2022

Relationships of Cannabis Policy Liberalization With Alcohol Use and Co-Use With Cannabis: A Narrative Review.

Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Rosanna Smart, Marlene C Lira, Seema Choksy Pessar, Jason G Blanchette, Timothy S Naimi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alcohol research : current reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rosalie Liccardo PaculaUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Rosanna SmartRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Marlene C LiraBoston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Seema Choksy PessarUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jason G BlanchetteBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Timothy S NaimiCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Martha Jane Bailey · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
Impact of Marijuana Policies on Alcohol Use and Alcohol-Related MortalityR01AA026268 · NIAAA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI NAIMI, TIMOTHY SIMONDS · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026268NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe liberalization of cannabis policies has the potential to affect the use of other substances and the harms from using them, particularly alcohol. Although a previous review of this literature found conflicting results regarding the relationship between cannabis policy and alcohol-related outcomes, cannabis policies have continued to evolve rapidly in the years since that review. SEARCH

methodsThe authors conducted a narrative review of studies published between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, that assessed the effects of cannabis policies on the use of alcohol in the United States or Canada. SEARCH

resultsThe initial search identified 3,446 unique monographs. Of these, 23 met all inclusion criteria and were included in the review, and five captured simultaneous or concurrent use of alcohol and cannabis. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsAssociations between cannabis policy liberalization and alcohol use, alcohol-related outcomes, and the co-use of alcohol and cannabis were inconclusive, with studies finding positive associations, no associations, and negative associations. Although several studies found that cannabis policy liberalization was associated with decreases in alcohol use measures, these same studies showed no impact of the cannabis policy on cannabis use itself. The lack of a consistent association was robust to subject age, outcome measure (e.g., use, medical utilization, driving), and type of cannabis policy; however, this may be due to the small number of studies for each type of outcome. This paper discusses several notable limitations of the evidence base and offers suggestions for improving consistency and comparability of research going forward, including a stronger classification of cannabis policy, inclusion of measures of the alcohol policy environment, verification of the impact of cannabis policy on cannabis use, and consideration of mediation effects.

Indexed as

CannabisHallucinogensAlcohol DrinkingEthanolHumansPublic PolicyUnited StatesEthanolHallucinogensalcoholcannabisco-usemarijuanaoutcomespolicypublic health

Identifiers

PMID35360879
PMCPMC8936161
OpenAlexW4226158694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.