ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
Comparative Analysis of Codon Bias in the Chloroplast Genomes of Theaceae Species.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Comprehensive analysis of synonymous codon usage bias and evolutionary dynamics in the chloroplast genomes of eight Coptis species.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Codon Usage Patterns in Chloroplast Genomes of Maple (Genus Acer).Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Chloroplast Genome Insights ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of six new chloroplast genomes in Platanthera (Orchidaceae) enhances understanding of its diversification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Codon usage patterns and phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes reveal evolutionary insights into Asphodelaceae species.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of 73 Aconitum chloroplast genomes reveals their structure, codon usage bias, and phylogenetic relationships within family Ranunculaceae.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Chloroplast genome sequencing of Poa pratensis and comparative chloroplast genomics analysis with other 29 grass species.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Analysis and comparison of chloroplast genome codon usage patterns in five accessions of Toxicodendron vernicifluum.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of chloroplast genome evolution in Poaceae: codon usage patterns, selection pressures, and phylogenomic relationships.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Comprehensive analysis of chloroplast codon usage patterns in the important medicinal genusFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Phylogenomics, divergence time estimation, and biogeography ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Codon Usage Pattern and its Influencing Factors for Mitochondrial CO Genes Among Different Subfamilies of Cerambycidae.Biochemical genetics · 2025Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofGenes · 2025Article
- Article
- Phylogenomic Analyses and DNA Barcoding Development Within Moraceae: Insights Into Genomic Features, Mutational Hotspots, and Adaptive Evolution.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Codon Usage Bias of the Polyphenol Oxidase Genes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Codon Usage Bias in Transcriptomes of Eight Species of Formicidae.Genes · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Theaceae species are dicotyledonous angiosperms with extremely high ornamental and economic value. The chloroplast genome is traditionally used to study species evolution, expression of chloroplast genes and chloroplast transformation. Codon usage bias (CUB) analysis is beneficial for investigations of evolutionary relationships and can be used to improve gene expression efficiency in genetic transformation research. However, there are relatively few systematic studies of the CUB in the chloroplast genomes of Theaceae species. In this study, CUB and nucleotide compositions parameters were determined by the scripts written in the Perl language, CodonW 1.4.2, CU.Win2000, RStudio and SPSS 23.0. The chloroplast genome data of 40 Theaceae species were obtained to analyse the codon usage (CU) characteristics of the coding regions and the influence of the source of variation on CUB. To explore the relationship between the CUB and gene expression levels in these 40 Theaceae plastomes, the synonymous codon usage order (SCUO) and measure independent of length and composition (MILC) values were determined. Finally, phylogenetic analysis revealed the genetic evolutionary relationships among these Theaceae species. Our results showed that based on the chloroplast genomes of these 40 Theaceae species, the CUB was for codons containing A/T bases and those that ended with A/T bases. Moreover, there was great commonality in the CUB of the Theaceae species according to comparative analysis of relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) and relative frequency of synonymous codon (RFSC): these species had 29 identical codons with bias (RSCU > 1), and there were 19 identical high-frequency codons. The CUB of Theaceae species is mainly affected by natural selection. The SCUO value of the 40 Theaceae species was 0.23 or 0.24, and the chloroplast gene expression level was moderate, according to MILC values. Additionally, we observed a positive correlation between the SCUO and MILC values, which indicated that CUB might affect gene expression. Furthermore, the phylogenetic analysis showed that the evolutionary relationships in these 40 Theaceae species were relatively conserved. A systematic study on the CUB and expression of Theaceae species provides further evidence for their evolution and phylogeny.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.