ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Hemopneumothorax due to subacute right ventricular perforation by a pacemaker lead with subtle clinical presentation.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subacute pacemaker lead migration with cardiac perforation and extracardiac extension into lung parenchyma with associated pneumothorax.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Management of a patient with an unusual trajectory of a temporary trans-venous pacing lead.World journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Surgical management of left bundle branch pacing lead causing septal and left ventricular perforation.HeartRhythm case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subacute right ventricular perforation by a pacemaker lead is a rare complication. Although occasionally asymptomatic, complicated cases are usually evidently symptomatic. Here, we report a 70-year-old man presented with mild left-sided chest pain three days after permanent pacemaker implantation. Suspected of ventricular perforation by the pacemaker lead on chest X-ray, device interrogation revealed non-corroborative parameters. This warranted a computed tomography (CT) scan, which confirmed the diagnosis, detected hemopneumothorax, and helped plan surgical intervention. The patient underwent surgical management with the placement of an epicardial pacemaker lead and was discharged after five days. Our case illustrates a rare report of subtle clinical presentation in a patient with subacute right ventricular perforation by a pacemaker lead complicated by hemopneumothorax. It further recapitulates the role of CT scan in providing definitive diagnostic information in managing such a patient. Anticipation of such a presentation is essential for primary care physicians, who are often a first contact point for a patient in the community. This requires a high index of suspicion in such patients presenting with minimal symptoms. Early recognition and timely referral by a family physician may prevent untoward consequences of device-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.