Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35360734›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Construction and Interpretation of Prediction Model of Teicoplanin Trough Concentration

Pan Ma, Ruixiang Liu, Wenrui Gu, Qing Dai, Yu Gan, Jing Cen, Shenglan Shang, Fang Liu, Yongchuan Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pan MaDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Ruixiang LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Wenrui GuDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Qing DaiDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Yu GanDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Jing CenDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Shenglan ShangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of PLA, Wuhan, China.
Fang LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Yongchuan ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Army Medical University · CNGeneral Hospital of Central Theater Command

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To establish an optimal model to predict the teicoplanin trough concentrations by machine learning, and explain the feature importance in the prediction model using the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 279 therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) measurements obtained from 192 patients who were treated with teicoplanin intravenously at the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from November 2017 to July 2021. This study included 27 variables, and the teicoplanin trough concentrations were considered as the target variable. The whole dataset was divided into a training group and testing group at the ratio of 8:2, and predictive performance was compared among six different algorithms. Algorithms with higher model performance (top 3) were selected to establish the ensemble prediction model and SHAP was employed to interpret the model. Results: Three algorithms (SVR, GBRT, and RF) with high Conclusion: We firstly adopted a machine learning approach to predict the teicoplanin trough concentration, and interpreted the prediction model by the SHAP method, which is of great significance and value for the clinical medication guidance.

Indexed as

algorithmmachine learningmodel explanationprecision medicineprediction modelSHAPteicoplanin

Identifiers

PMID35360734
PMCPMC8963816
OpenAlexW4221075831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.