Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35360714›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Comparative Study of Relative Peripheral Refraction in Children With Different Degrees of Myopia.

Lu Xiaoli, Zheng Xiangyue, Lian Lihua, Huang Yuting, Lin Chuni, Xia Yujie, Wang Zhao, Yu Xiaoyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Longitudinal Changes in Relative Peripheral Refraction During Childhood Myopia Onset: A 3-year Prospective Observation.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. IMI-Instrumentation for Myopia Management.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lu XiaoliDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Zheng XiangyueDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Lian LihuaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Huang YutingDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Lin ChuniFirst Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xia YujieFirst Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Wang ZhaoFirst Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yu XiaoyiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the difference in the retinal refraction difference value (RDV) using multispectral refractive topography (MRT). Methods: Ninety myopic participants, who met the enrolment requirements, were examined with an automatic optometer after mydriasis. According to the value of the spherical equivalent (SE), the participants were divided into Emmetropia group (E, +0.5D < SE < -0.5D), Low Myopia (LM, -0.5D < SE ≤ -3D), and Moderate and high Myopia (MM, -3D < SE ≤ -10D). The ocular biological parameters were detected by optical biometrics (Lenstar 900, Switzerland), including axial length (AL), lens thickness (LT), and keratometry (K1, K2). Furthermore, the MRT was used to measure the retinal RDV at three concentric areas, with 15-degree intervals from fovea into 45 degrees (RDV-15, RDV 15-30, and RDV 30-45), and four sectors, including RDV-S (RDV-Superior), RDV-I (RDV-Inferior), RDV-T (RDV-Temporal), and RDV-N (RDV-Nasal). Results: In the range of RDV-15, there was a significant difference in the value of RDV-15 between Group E (-0.007 ± 0.148) Conclusions: In this study, there was a significant difference in the value of RDV among Group E, Group LM, and Group MM, and the value of RDV in Group MM was the highest on the whole. In the range of RDV 30-45, there was a growing trend with the increase in the degree of myopia among the three groups. Furthermore, the SE negatively correlated with AL, RDV 30-45, RDV-S, RDV-I, and RDV-N.

Indexed as

childrendegrees of myopiamultispectral refractive topography (MRT)relative peripheral refractionretinal relative diopter (RDV)

Identifiers

PMID35360714
PMCPMC8960133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.