ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Prediction of the Fundus Tessellation Severity With Machine Learning Methods.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between fundus tessellated density and subfoveal choroidal thickness in children with different refractive statuses.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advancements in AI-based quantitative analysis of fundus tessellation and its application in myopia research.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The Associations Between Myopia and Fundus Tessellation in School Children: A Comparative Analysis of Macular and Peripapillary Regions Using Deep Learning.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Quantification of Fundus Tessellation Reflects Early Myopic Maculopathy in a Large-Scale Population of Children and Adolescents.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Fundus Tessellated Density in Highly Myopic Glaucoma Using Deep Learning.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Machine learning regression algorithms to predict short-term efficacy after anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular edema based on real-world data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Prevalence of Fundus Tessellation and Its Screening Based on Artificial Intelligence in Chinese Children: the Nanjing Eye Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Fundus Tessellated Density Assessed by Deep Learning in Primary School Children.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To predict the fundus tessellation (FT) severity with machine learning methods. Methods: A population-based cross-sectional study with 3,468 individuals (mean age of 64.6 ± 9.8 years) based on Beijing Eye Study 2011. Participants underwent detailed ophthalmic examinations including fundus images. Five machine learning methods including ordinal logistic regression, ordinal probit regression, ordinal log-gamma regression, ordinal forest and neural network were used. Main Outcome Measure: FT precision, recall, F1-score, weighted-average F1-score and AUC value. Results: Observed from the in-sample fitting performance, the optimal model was ordinal forest, which had correct classification rate (precision) of 81.28%, while 34.75, 93.73, 70.03, and 24.82% in each classified group by FT severity. The AUC value was 0.7249. And the F1-score was 65.05%, weighted-average F1-score was 79.64% on the whole dataset. For out-of-sample prediction performance, the optimal model was ordinal logistic regression, which had precision of 77.12% on the validation dataset, while 19.57, 92.68, 64.74, and 6.76% in each classified group by FT severity. The AUC value was 0.7187. The classification accuracy of light FT group was the highest, while that of severe FT group was the lowest. And the F1-score was 54.46%, weighted-average F1-score was 74.19% on the whole dataset. Conclusions: The ordinal forest and ordinal logistic regression model had the strong prediction in-sample and out-sample performance, respectively. The threshold ranges of the ordinal forest model for no FT and light, moderate, severe FT were [0, 0.3078], [0.3078, 0.3347], [0.3347, 0.4048], [0.4048, 1], respectively. Likewise, the threshold ranges of ordinal logistic regression model were ≤ 3.7389, [3.7389, 10.5053], [10.5053, 13.9323], > 13.9323. These results can be applied to guide clinical fundus disease screening and FT severity assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.