Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35360470›Full record

ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2022

Self-Oriented Empathy and Personality Organisation Level: Insights from a Psychiatric Sample.

Emanuele Pick, Chiara Pavan, Massimo Marini, Ylenia Cariolato, Elisabetta Bogliolo, Tommaso Toffanin, Arianna Palmieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emanuele PickDipartimento Filosofia, Sociologia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata - Università degli Studi di Padova - Padova - Italia.
Chiara PavanDipartimento di Medicina - Università degli Studi di Padova - Padova - Italia.
Massimo MariniDipartimento di Medicina - Università degli Studi di Padova - Padova - Italia.
Ylenia CariolatoDipartimento Filosofia, Sociologia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata - Università degli Studi di Padova - Padova - Italia.
Elisabetta BoglioloDipartimento Filosofia, Sociologia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata - Università degli Studi di Padova - Padova - Italia.
Tommaso ToffaninPsychiatric Clinic - Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova - Padova - Italia.
Arianna PalmieriDipartimento Filosofia, Sociologia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata - Università degli Studi di Padova - Padova - Italia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Empathy functioning is among the criteria to delineate psychiatric diagnosis. However, the self-oriented empathy dimension is almost neglected in the existing literature. On the basis of previous fragmented contributions, we hypothesised that an individual's level of personality organisation is explained by this facet of empathy more than the other components of empathy, both transversally and independently from the specific psychiatric diagnosis. Method: Fifty-nine psychiatric inpatients were evaluated with clinical interviews inspired by the Structured Clinical Interview for Results: The first series of models revealed self-oriented empathy (IRI personal distress subscale) as the best empathic dimension to explain levels of personality organisation. The second series revealed that none of the four IRI subscales explained psychiatric diagnoses. Conclusions: The consistency of our findings with evolutionary concepts pertaining to both traditional psychodynamic models and contemporary models of psychopathology, such as the

Indexed as

Interpersonal Reactivity Indexlevel of personality organisationother-oriented empathypsychiatric inpatientsself-oriented empathy

Identifiers

PMID35360470
PMCPMC8951166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.