Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35360365›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2022

The Diagnosis of Dengue in Patients Presenting With Acute Febrile Illness Using Supervised Machine Learning and Impact of Seasonality.

Damien K Ming, Nguyen M Tuan, Bernard Hernandez, Sorawat Sangkaew, Nguyen L Vuong, Ho Q Chanh, Nguyen V V Chau, Cameron P Simmons, Bridget Wills, Pantelis Georgiou and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Damien K MingCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nguyen M TuanChildren's Hospital 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Bernard HernandezCentre for BioInspired Technology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sorawat SangkaewCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nguyen L VuongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Ho Q ChanhOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen V V ChauOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Cameron P SimmonsInstitute of Vector Borne Disease, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Bridget WillsOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Pantelis GeorgiouCentre for BioInspired Technology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alison H HolmesCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sophie YacoubOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Symptomatic dengue infection can result in a life-threatening shock syndrome and timely diagnosis is essential. Point-of-care tests for non-structural protein 1 and IgM are used widely but performance can be limited. We developed a supervised machine learning model to predict whether patients with acute febrile illnesses had a diagnosis of dengue or other febrile illnesses (OFI). The impact of seasonality on model performance over time was examined. Methods: We analysed data from a prospective observational clinical study in Vietnam. Enrolled patients presented with an acute febrile illness of <72 h duration. A gradient boosting model (XGBoost) was used to predict final diagnosis using age, sex, haematocrit, platelet, white cell, and lymphocyte count collected on enrolment. Data was randomly split 80/20% into a training and hold-out set, respectively, with the latter not used in model development. Cross-validation and hold out set testing was used, with performance over time evaluated through a rolling window approach. Results: We included 8,100 patients recruited between 16th October 2010 and 10th December 2014. In total 2,240 (27.7%) patients were diagnosed with dengue infection. The optimised model from training data had an overall median area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) of 0.86 (interquartile range 0.84-0.86), specificity of 0.92, sensitivity of 0.56, positive predictive value of 0.73, negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.84, and Brier score of 0.13 in predicting the final diagnosis, with similar performances in hold-out set testing (AUROC of 0.86). Model performances varied significantly over time as a function of seasonality and other factors. Incorporation of a dynamic threshold which continuously learns from recent cases resulted in a more consistent performance throughout the year (NPV >90%). Conclusion: Supervised machine learning models are able to discriminate between dengue and OFI diagnoses in patients presenting with an early undifferentiated febrile illness. These models could be of clinical utility in supporting healthcare decision-making and provide passive surveillance across dengue endemic regions. Effects of seasonality and changing disease prevalence must however be taken into account-this is of significant importance given unpredictable effects of human-induced climate change and the impact on health.

Indexed as

climate changedenguediagnosisseasonalitysupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID35360365
PMCPMC8963938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.