ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
A Collaborative Approach for the Development and Application of Machine Learning Solutions for CMR-Based Cardiac Disease Classification.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative Advances in Non-Invasive Detection Technologies for Heart Failure: Synergistic Application of Multimodal Sensing and Intelligent Algorithms.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Towards fully automated synthetic ECV quantification: an open-access machine learning-based approach for fast blood draw-free CMR.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating conformal prediction with machine learning for uncertainty-aware risk stratification in coronary artery disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- A hybrid segmentation and classification CAD framework for automated myocardial infarction prediction from MRI images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Review
- Towards automatic classification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance Task Force Criteria for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quality and acceptance of machine learning (ML) approaches in cardiovascular data interpretation depends strongly on model design and training and the interaction with the clinical experts. We hypothesize that a software infrastructure for the training and application of ML models can support the improvement of the model training and provide relevant information for understanding the classification-relevant data features. The presented solution supports an iterative training, evaluation, and exploration of machine-learning-based multimodal data interpretation methods considering cardiac MRI data. Correction, annotation, and exploration of clinical data and interpretation of results are supported through dedicated interactive visual analytics tools. We test the presented concept with two use cases from the ACDC and EMIDEC cardiac MRI image analysis challenges. In both applications, pre-trained 2D U-Nets are used for segmentation, and classifiers are trained for diagnostic tasks using radiomics features of the segmented anatomical structures. The solution was successfully used to identify outliers in automatic segmentation and image acquisition. The targeted curation and addition of expert annotations improved the performance of the machine learning models. Clinical experts were supported in understanding specific anatomical and functional characteristics of the assigned disease classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.