ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022
Long Lasting Cellular Immune Response Induced by mRNA Vaccination: Implication for Prevention Strategies.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct pharmacological AMPK activation inhibits mucosal SARS-CoV-2 infection by reducing lipid metabolism, restoring autophagy flux and the type I IFN response.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Vaccination Strategies: Mixing Paths Versus Matching Tracks.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Review
- Humoral and cellular immune durability of different COVID-19 vaccine platforms following homologous/heterologous boosters: one-year post vaccination.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Relapse of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Impact of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory B cells on the immune response after mRNA-based Comirnaty vaccine in seronegative health care workers.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Humoral and T-cell response 12 months after the first BNT162b2 vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients and controls: Kinetics, associated factors, and role of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the COVID19 pandemic continues to spread and vaccinations are administered throughout the world at different rates and with different strategies, understanding the multiple aspects of the immune response to vaccinations is required to define more efficient vaccination strategies. To date, the duration of protection induced by COVID19 vaccines is still matter of debate. To assess whether 2-doses vaccination with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was sufficient to induce a persistent specific cellular immune response, we evaluated the presence of SARS-COV2 Spike-specific B and T lymphocytes in 28 healthcare workers 1 and 7 months after completing the vaccination cycle. The results showed that at 7 months after second dose a population of Spike-specific B lymphocytes was still present in 86% of the immunized subjects, with a higher frequency when compared to not-immunized controls (0.38% ± 0.07 vs 0.13% ± 0.03, p<0.001). Similarly, specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, able to respond
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.