ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2022
Bioabsorbable Polydioxanone Mesh for Soft Tissue Reinforcement in Revisional Breast Surgery.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-term Outcomes of Polydioxanone Synthetic Mesh in 2-stage Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Center Comparative Study.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2026Article
- Early Experience with Synthetic Monofilament Polydioxanone Mesh in Primary Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Matched Analysis.Archives of plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Early Use and Outcomes of Polydioxanone Mesh in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Early Performance of a Multifilament Resorbable Synthetic Mesh in Aesthetic Breast Surgery: A 206 Patient Experience.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Review
- A Comparison of Capsular Contracture Rates after Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Using Biologic versus Synthetic Mesh.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Revision Breast Reconstruction With Biologic or Synthetic Mesh: An Analysis of Postoperative Capsular Contracture Rates.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2024Article
- Advances on Capsular Contracture-Prevention and Management Strategies: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Commentary on: Bioabsorbable Polydioxanone Mesh for Soft Tissue Reinforcement in Revisional Breast Surgery.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The need for revision procedures after breast implant surgery often arises from the failure of soft tissues to provide a stable implant pocket. Meshes or dermal matrices have been used to reinforce the implant's soft tissue support. Durasorb (Surgical Innovation Associates, Chicago, IL) is a resorbable polydioxanone (PDO) mesh indicated for soft tissue reinforcement. Its monofilament, macroporous design allows for ease of handling and rapid tissue incorporation. The extended timeline of PDO bioabsorption provides support during the critical portions of soft tissue healing while avoiding long-term complications of permanent products. Objectives: Evaluate the efficacy of Durasorb PDO mesh for soft tissue reinforcement in revision breast surgery. Methods: This is a prospective case series of 17 patients (27 breasts) undergoing revision breast implant surgery with Durasorb PDO mesh. Results: Five patients (5 breasts) presented for revision after implant placement for breast reconstruction, with the remaining 22 presenting for revision after implant placement for cosmetic indications. Average patient age was 47.9 years, and average BMI 24.3. Indications for surgery were implant malposition (37%), capsular contracture (30%), poor cosmesis/asymmetry (26%), and recurrent soft tissue ptosis (7%). Follow up averaged 355 days (range 174 to 799 days, SD=155). One patient experienced a seroma 2 weeks post-operatively, which resolved after a single aspiration. No infections, wound healing problems, or recurrences of implant malposition/capsular contracture were encountered. Conclusions: Durasorb PDO mesh appears to be efficacious as a breast implant pocket reinforcement in the reoperative setting with a low complication rate and durable results. Level of Evidence 4:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.