Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359872›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Strategies Based on 15 Types of Stem Cells in Animal Models.

Zhizhong Shang, Ruirui Wang, Dongliang Li, Jinlei Chen, Baolin Zhang, Mingchuan Wang, Xin Wang, Pingping Wanyan

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Transcriptomics Insights into Spinal Cord Injury for Therapy Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Biomaterials and cell-based therapy post spinal cord injury.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Recent Advances in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhizhong ShangThe First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Ruirui WangThe First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Dongliang LiThe First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jinlei ChenThe First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Baolin ZhangThe First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Mingchuan WangThe First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xin WangThe First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Pingping WanyanGansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

animal studiesnetwork meta-analysisspinal cord injurystem cellsystematic reviewtherapeutic strategies

Identifiers

PMID35359872
PMCPMC8964098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.