ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2022
Exploring Unsupervised Machine Learning Classification Methods for Physiological Stress Detection.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Heart Rate to Measure Stress in Healthcare Workers Wearing PAPRs and N95 Masks: Insights from a Randomized Trial.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Trial
- MOL classification: a novel meiotic spindle scoring system for predicting human embryo development and ploidy.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Structural Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Smart Microbiomes: How AI Is Revolutionizing Personalized Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in the management of metabolic disorders: a comprehensive review.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence driven mental health diagnosis based on physiological signals.MethodsX · 2025Article
- From lab to real-life: A three-stage validation of wearable technology for stress monitoring.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Machine learning in solid organ transplantation: Charting the evolving landscape.World journal of transplantation · 2025Article
- Validity of Perceived Stress Scale in Brazilian low-income college students.Revista de saude publica · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review of machine learning algorithms and their application in geriatric medicine: present and future.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Review
- Stress Monitoring Using Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study and Stress-Predict Dataset.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Applications of machine learning in metabolomics: Disease modeling and classification.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, there has been a significant development in wearable health technologies for diagnosis and monitoring, including application to stress monitoring. Most of the wearable stress monitoring systems are built on a supervised learning classification algorithm. These systems rely on the collection of sensor and reference data during the development phase. One of the most challenging tasks in physiological or pathological stress monitoring is the labeling of the physiological signals collected during an experiment. Commonly, different types of self-reporting questionnaires are used to label the perceived stress instances. These questionnaires only capture stress levels at a specific point in time. Moreover, self-reporting is subjective and prone to inaccuracies. This paper explores the potential feasibility of unsupervised learning clustering classifiers such as Affinity Propagation, Balanced Iterative Reducing and Clustering using Hierarchies (BIRCH), K-mean, Mini-Batch K-mean, Mean Shift, Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) and Ordering Points To Identify the Clustering Structure (OPTICS) for implementation in stress monitoring wearable devices. Traditional supervised machine learning (linear, ensembles, trees, and neighboring models) classifiers require hand-crafted features and labels while on the other hand, the unsupervised classifier does not require any labels of perceived stress levels and performs classification based on clustering algorithms. The classification results of unsupervised machine learning classifiers are found comparable to supervised machine learning classifiers on two publicly available datasets. The analysis and results of this comparative study demonstrate the potential of unsupervised learning for the development of non-invasive, continuous, and robust detection and monitoring of physiological and pathological stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.