Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359704›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2022

How Tilting the Head Interferes With Eye-Hand Coordination: The Role of Gravity in Visuo-Proprioceptive, Cross-Modal Sensory Transformations.

Jules Bernard-Espina, Daniele Dal Canto, Mathieu Beraneck, Joseph McIntyre, Michele Tagliabue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Singular Theory of Sensorimotor Coordination: On Targeted Motions in Space.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Modality-Independent Effect of Gravity in Shaping the Internal Representation of 3D Space for Visual and Haptic Object Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jules Bernard-EspinaUniversité de Paris, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.
Daniele Dal CantoUniversité de Paris, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.
Mathieu BeraneckUniversité de Paris, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.
Joseph McIntyreUniversité de Paris, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.
Michele TagliabueUniversité de Paris, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d’Aquitaine · FRTecnalia · ESUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To correctly position the hand with respect to the spatial location and orientation of an object to be reached/grasped, visual information about the target and proprioceptive information from the hand must be compared. Since visual and proprioceptive sensory modalities are inherently encoded in a retinal and musculo-skeletal reference frame, respectively, this comparison requires cross-modal sensory transformations. Previous studies have shown that lateral tilts of the head interfere with the visuo-proprioceptive transformations. It is unclear, however, whether this phenomenon is related to the neck flexion or to the head-gravity misalignment. To answer to this question, we performed three virtual reality experiments in which we compared a grasping-like movement with lateral neck flexions executed in an upright seated position and while lying supine. In the main experiment, the task requires cross-modal transformations, because the target information is visually acquired, and the hand is sensed through proprioception only. In the other two control experiments, the task is unimodal, because both target and hand are sensed through one, and the same, sensory channel (vision and proprioception, respectively), and, hence, cross-modal processing is unnecessary. The results show that lateral neck flexions have considerably different effects in the seated and supine posture, but only for the cross-modal task. More precisely, the subjects' response variability and the importance associated to the visual encoding of the information significantly increased when supine. We show that these findings are consistent with the idea that head-gravity misalignment interferes with the visuo-proprioceptive cross-modal processing. Indeed, the principle of statistical optimality in multisensory integration predicts the observed results if the noise associated to the visuo-proprioceptive transformations is assumed to be affected by gravitational signals, and not by neck proprioceptive signals

Indexed as

cross-modal transformationeye-hand coordinationgravitymultisensory integrationotolithproprioceptionreaching/grasping movementvision

Identifiers

PMID35359704
PMCPMC8961421
OpenAlexW4220840416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.