Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359693›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of thoracic and critical care medicine2021

Prognostic value of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score among critically ill medical and surgical patients with suspected infection in a resource-limited setting.

L A Bishop, D P K Wilson, R D Wise, S M Savarimuthu, G L Anesi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

L A BishopDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
D P K WilsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
R D WiseDiscipline of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
S M SavarimuthuDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
G L AnesiDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
University of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · USYale University · US

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL154200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is a simple bedside tool validated outside of the intensive care unit (ICU) to identify patients with suspected infection who are at risk for poor outcomes. Objectives: To assess qSOFA at the time of ICU referral as a mortality prognosticator in adult medical v. surgical patients with suspected infection admitted to an ICU in a resource-limited regional hospital in South Africa (SA). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on adult medical or surgical patients that were admitted to an ICU in a resource-limited hospital in SA. We performed univariate and multivariable logistic regression and compared nested models using likelihood ratio test, and we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: We recruited a total of 1 162 (medical n=283 and surgical n=875) participants in the study who were admitted to the ICU with suspected infection. qSOFA at the time of ICU referral was highly associated with but poorly discriminant of in-ICU mortality among medical (odds ratio (OR) 2.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 - 5.71; p=0.02; AUROC 0.60; 95% CI 0.53 - 0.67; p=0.02) and surgical (OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.73-4.36; p<0.001; AUROC 0.60; 95% CI 0.55 - 0.65; p=0.04) patients. qSOFA model performance was similar between medical and surgical subgroups (p≥0.26). Addition of qSOFA to a baseline risk factor model including age, sex, and HIV status improved the model discrimination in both subgroups (medical AUROC 0.64; 95% CI 0.56 - 0.71; p=0.049; surgical AUROC 0.69; 95% CI 0.64 - 0.74; p<0.0001). Conclusion: qSOFA was highly associated with, but poorly discriminant for, poor outcomes among medical and surgical patients with suspected infection admitted to the ICU in a resource-limited setting. These findings suggest that qSOFA may be useful as a tool to identify patients at increased risk of mortality in these populations and in this context.

Indexed as

adultintensive careprognosisqSOFAsepsis

Identifiers

PMID35359693
PMCPMC8948475
OpenAlexW4210583187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.