Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359648›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

A Comparison of LASSO Regression and Tree-Based Models for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Elderly Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Ping Hu, Yangfan Liu, Yuntao Li, Geng Guo, Zhongzhou Su, Xu Gao, Junhui Chen, Yangzhi Qi, Yang Xu, Tengfeng Yan and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia after cerebral aneurysm rupture using explainable machine learning approach.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ping HuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yangfan LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Panzhihua University, Panzhihua, China.
Yuntao LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Geng GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Zhongzhou SuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, China.
Xu GaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Junhui ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yangzhi QiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yang XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Tengfeng YanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Liguo YeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Qian SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Gang DengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hongbo ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Qianxue ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wuhan University · CNGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military Region · CNHuzhou Central Hospital · CNNanchang University · CNPanzhihua University · CNShanxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds: As a most widely used machine learning method, tree-based algorithms have not been applied to predict delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) in elderly patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Hence, this study aims to develop the conventional regression and tree-based models and determine which model has better prediction performance for DCI development in hospitalized elderly patients after aSAH. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study analyzing elderly patients with aSAH aged 60 years and older. We randomly divided the multicentral data into model training and validation cohort in a ratio of 70-30%. One conventional regression and tree-based model, such as least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), was developed. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) with 95% Results: There were 111 and 42 patients in the model training and validation cohorts, and 53 cases developed DCI. According to AUC-ROC value in the model internal validation, DT of 0.836 (95% Conclusions: The LASSO had a superior prediction power than tree-based models in external validation. As a result, we recommend the conventional LASSO regression model to predict DCI in elderly patients with aSAH.

Indexed as

aneurysmdelayed cerebral ischemiaLASSOsubarachnoid hemorrhagetree model

Identifiers

PMID35359648
PMCPMC8960268
OpenAlexW4220681732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.