ArticleJournal of diabetes research2022
The Impact of Systolic Blood Pressure, Pulse Pressure, and Their Variability on Diabetes Retinopathy among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of arterial stiffness and eye disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Diabetic retinopathy: why some eyes suffer more - a focus on retina-specific risk factors and metabolic memory.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Research progress on the correlation between blood pressure variability and hypertensive microvascular disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Hemodynamic phenotypes defined by arterial stiffness index and pulse pressure with risk of diabetic microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Association of hypertension and long-term blood pressure changes with new-onset diabetes in the elderly: A 10-year cohort study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Risk Factors as Independent Predictors of Diabetic Retinopathy in Type II Diabetes Mellitus: The Development of a Predictive Model.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Construction of Risk Prediction Model of Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease Based on Deep Learning.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2024Article
- Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and risk of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2024Article
- Risk Factors for Diabetic Retinopathy in Latin America (Mexico) and the World: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Are Independent Risk Factors for Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Biomedicines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effects of variations in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) on diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: A total of 3275 type 2 diabetes patients without DR at Taiwan Lee's United Clinic from 2002 to 2014 were enrolled in the study. The average age of the patients was 65.5 (±12.2) years, and the follow-up period ranged from 3 to 10 years. Blood pressure variability was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of the average blood pressure values over the entire study period and was calculated for each patient. The mean SD for SBP was 11.16, and a SBP ≥ 130 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) was defined as high SBP. Based on these data, patients were divided into four groups as follows: group 1 (G1, mean SBP < 130 mmHg, SD of SBP < 11.16 mmHg), group 2 (G2, mean SBP < 130 mmHg, SD ≥ 11.16 mmHg), group 3 (G3, mean SBP ≥ 130 mmHg, SD of SBP < 11.16 mmHg), and group 4 (G4, mean SBP ≥ 130 mmHg, SD ≥ 11.16 mmHg). Based on a mean PP of 80 mmHg with a pulse pressure SD of 6.53 mmHg, the patients were regrouped into four groups designated G1'-G4'. Results: After adjusting for patient age, sex, and disease course, Cox regression showed that the mean and SD of SBP, pulse pressure, and their SDs were risk factors for DR. After stratifying the patients based on the mean and SD of the SBP, we found that the patients in the G4 group had the highest risk of DR (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.980, 95% CI: 1.716~2.285, Conclusions: Variability in SBP and PP are risk factors for DR in patients with type 2 diabetes. The variability of PP was better able to predict the occurrence of DR than mean pulse pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.