Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359566›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes research2022

The Impact of Systolic Blood Pressure, Pulse Pressure, and Their Variability on Diabetes Retinopathy among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Qingqing Lou, Xue Chen, Kun Wang, Huanhuan Liu, Zongjun Zhang, Yaujiunn Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qingqing LouDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570102 Hainan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4743-0900
Xue ChenJiangsu College of Nursing, Huaian, 223023 Jiangsu, China.
Kun WangDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570102 Hainan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8487-6664
Huanhuan LiuDepartment of Endocrinology, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou, 570311 Hainan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8685-6114
Zongjun ZhangRadiology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210028, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5846-8453
Yaujiunn LeeLee's Clinic, No. 396, Guangdong RD, Pingtung City, Pingtung County, 900, Taiwan.
Hainan Medical University · CNHainan General Hospital · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of variations in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) on diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: A total of 3275 type 2 diabetes patients without DR at Taiwan Lee's United Clinic from 2002 to 2014 were enrolled in the study. The average age of the patients was 65.5 (±12.2) years, and the follow-up period ranged from 3 to 10 years. Blood pressure variability was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of the average blood pressure values over the entire study period and was calculated for each patient. The mean SD for SBP was 11.16, and a SBP ≥ 130 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) was defined as high SBP. Based on these data, patients were divided into four groups as follows: group 1 (G1, mean SBP < 130 mmHg, SD of SBP < 11.16 mmHg), group 2 (G2, mean SBP < 130 mmHg, SD ≥ 11.16 mmHg), group 3 (G3, mean SBP ≥ 130 mmHg, SD of SBP < 11.16 mmHg), and group 4 (G4, mean SBP ≥ 130 mmHg, SD ≥ 11.16 mmHg). Based on a mean PP of 80 mmHg with a pulse pressure SD of 6.53 mmHg, the patients were regrouped into four groups designated G1'-G4'. Results: After adjusting for patient age, sex, and disease course, Cox regression showed that the mean and SD of SBP, pulse pressure, and their SDs were risk factors for DR. After stratifying the patients based on the mean and SD of the SBP, we found that the patients in the G4 group had the highest risk of DR (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.980, 95% CI: 1.716~2.285, Conclusions: Variability in SBP and PP are risk factors for DR in patients with type 2 diabetes. The variability of PP was better able to predict the occurrence of DR than mean pulse pressure.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyBlood PressureChildChild, PreschoolHumansProportional Hazards ModelsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35359566
PMCPMC8964233
OpenAlexW4220991413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.