Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359429›Full record

ArticleOccupational therapy international2022

Self-Management Embedded in Daily Activities: A Photoelicitation Focus Group Study among Persons with Spinal Cord Injury and Their Primary Caregivers in Bangladesh.

Salma Begum, Yeasir A Alve, Peter Bontje

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational therapy international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Salma BegumDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1888-9269
Yeasir A AlveDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5607-4146
Peter BontjeDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8188-0411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study explored how community-dwelling persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and their primary caregivers execute self-management strategies in daily activities. These strategies were mapped to a preexisting self-management framework. Methods: Photoelicitation focus group discussions were conducted among 14 adults with SCI and their primary caregivers (in two groups). Moreover, a constant comparative framework was used to analyze the data. Results: This study identified nine groups of self-management strategies, some of which could not be categorized under the three main self-management components generally accepted in the literature. Accordingly, a new component is proposed based off of this analysis, entitled management of social complexities, which includes crucial strategies such as (1) relocating to another environment, (2) behaving in an assertive manner, and (3) advocating for social change. Conclusion: The results show that self-management, traditionally described as medical, emotional, and role management, should also include the management of social complexities. The identified strategies could be considered in the development of self-management enhancement programs in lower-middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapySelf-ManagementSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultBangladeshCaregiversFocus GroupsHumans

Identifiers

PMID35359429
PMCPMC8941582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.