Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359419›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Vincristine, Irinotecan, and Temozolomide in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Neuroblastoma.

Jia Zhu, Juan Wang, Feifei Sun, Zijun Zhen, Tingting Chen, Suying Lu, Junting Huang, Yizhuo Zhang, Xiaofei Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. KAP1 stabilizes MYCN mRNA and promotes neuroblastoma tumorigenicity by protecting the RNA mJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jia ZhuCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.
Juan WangCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.
Feifei SunCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.
Zijun ZhenCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.
Tingting ChenCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.
Suying LuCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.
Junting HuangCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.
Yizhuo ZhangCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaofei SunCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South ChinaSun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The combination of irinotecan, temozolomide and vincristine has been proposed as an effective salvage regimen for some pediatric malignancies. Thus, we sought to evaluate this combination for patients with relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma (NB). Patients and Methods: In this retrospective study, forty-six patients with relapsed or refractory NB were treated with the combination of vincristine (1.5 mg/m Results: A total of 251 cycles (median 6 cycles/patient) were administered. A complete response (CR) was achieved in 5 patients, partial response (PR) in 27 patients, stable disease (SD) in 8 patients, and progression disease (PD) in 6 patients, with an overall objective response rate (CR+PR) of 69.6%. Eighteen patients developed diarrhea with Grade 3 or less. Grade 1-2 hematologic toxicity occurred in 10 patients. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity developed in 32 patients. VIT was an effective regimen for different metastatic sites. UGT1A*28 genotyping performed in 7 patients revealed wild type. Diarrhea occurred in 4 of them. Conclusion: The shorter, 5-day VIT regimen is an active and well-tolerated salvage regimen in relapse/refractory NB.

Indexed as

efficacyirinotecanneuroblastomarefractoryrelapsetemozolomidetoxicityvincristine

Identifiers

PMID35359419
PMCPMC8961432
OpenAlexW4220700302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.