Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359358›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Artificial Intelligence in Cervical Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.

Xin Hou, Guangyang Shen, Liqiang Zhou, Yinuo Li, Tian Wang, Xiangyi Ma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xin HouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Guangyang ShenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Liqiang ZhouCancer Centre and Center of Reproduction, Development and Aging, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, Macau SAR, China.
Yinuo LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Tian WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiangyi MaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer death in women, seriously threatening their physical and mental health. It is an easily preventable cancer with early screening and diagnosis. Although technical advancements have significantly improved the early diagnosis of cervical cancer, accurate diagnosis remains difficult owing to various factors. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI)-based medical diagnostic applications have been on the rise and have excellent applicability in the screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer. Their benefits include reduced time consumption, reduced need for professional and technical personnel, and no bias owing to subjective factors. We, thus, aimed to discuss how AI can be used in cervical cancer screening and diagnosis, particularly to improve the accuracy of early diagnosis. The application and challenges of using AI in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer are also discussed.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecervical cancercervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)colposcopycytologydeep learningearly screening and diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID35359358
PMCPMC8963491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.