Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359304›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Studying Ctenophora WBR Using Mnemiopsis leidyi.

Julia Ramon-Mateu, Allison Edgar, Dorothy Mitchell, Mark Q Martindale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Making Neurobots and Chimerical Ctenophores.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Brief History of Ctenophora.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  5. Stable Laboratory Culture System for the Ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia Ramon-MateuThe Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, St. Augustine, FL, USA. julia.ramon@imev-mer.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-8011
Allison EdgarThe Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, St. Augustine, FL, USA.
Dorothy MitchellThe Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, St. Augustine, FL, USA.
Mark Q MartindaleThe Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, St. Augustine, FL, USA. mqmartin@whitney.ufl.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-5640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ctenophores, also known as comb jellies, are a clade of fragile holopelagic, carnivorous marine invertebrates, that represent one of the most ancient extant groups of multicellular animals. Ctenophores show a remarkable ability to regenerate in the adult form, being capable of replacing all body parts (i.e., whole-body regeneration) after loss/amputation. With many favorable experimental features (optical clarity, stereotyped cell lineage, multiple cell types), a full genome sequence available and their early branching phylogenetic position, ctenophores are well placed to provide information about the evolution of regenerative ability throughout the Metazoa. Here, we provide a collection of detailed protocols for use of the lobate ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi to study whole-body regeneration, including specimen collection, husbandry, surgical manipulation, and imaging techniques.

Indexed as

CtenophoraAnimalsCell LineageGenomePhylogenyCtenophoreHusbandryLive imagingMnemiopsis leidyiSurgeriesTime-lapseWhole-body regenerationWound healing

Identifiers

PMID35359304
PMCPMC9761528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.