Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359187›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

Morphologic and histologic characterization of sheep and porcine TMJ as large animal models for tissue engineering applications.

Jonah D Lee, Josh I Becker, Lisa M Larkin, Alejandro J Almarza, Sunil D Kapila

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonah D LeeDepartment of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Josh I BeckerDepartment of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Lisa M LarkinDepartment of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Alejandro J AlmarzaDepartment of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Sunil D KapilaSection of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles School of Dentistry, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, CHS 33-089, Box 951668, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. skapila@dentistry.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0271-9548
University of Michigan · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare and characterize the structural and ultrastructural organization of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) between two large animal models for use in the development of tissue engineering strategies. MATERIALS AND

methodsWhole TMJs from sheep and pigs were evaluated with micro-computed tomography (μCT) for morphology and quantitative analyses of bone parameters. Histological examination was performed on the TMJ disc and its attachments to investigate regional distribution of collagen, elastin, and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs).

resultsμCT analyses demonstrate higher bone mineral density (BMD) in the temporal fossa compared to the mandibular condyle in both species, with this variable being significantly higher in sheep than pig. Quantitative morphometry of the trabecular condyle reveals no statistical differences between the species. Histology demonstrates similar structural organization of collagen and elastin between species. Elastin staining was nearly twofold greater in sheep than in the pig disc. Finally, Safranin-O staining for GAGs in the TMJ disc was localized to the intermediate zone in the sheep but was absent from the porcine disc.

conclusionsOur findings show some important differences in the pig and sheep TMJ μCT variables and histology and composition of the disc and discal attachment. These disparities likely reflect differences in masticatory and TMJ functional loading patterns between the two species and provide insights into large animal models towards human applications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As with the established pig model, the sheep is a suitable large animal model for TMJ research such as regenerative strategies, with specific considerations for design parameters appropriate for human-analog applications.

Indexed as

ElastinTemporomandibular Joint DisordersAnimalsCollagenDisease Models, AnimalGlycosaminoglycansHumansMandibular CondyleSheepSwineTemporomandibular JointTissue EngineeringX-Ray MicrotomographyCollagenElastinGlycosaminoglycansMicro-CTPigSheepTemporomandibular jointTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID35359187
PMCPMC9276584
OpenAlexW4220874868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.