Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359186›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

Maxillary sinus dimensions in skeletal class II population with different vertical skeletal patterns.

Abby Syverson, Chenshuang Li, Zhong Zheng, Evgenii Proskurnin, Chun-Hsi Chung, Min Zou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Abby Syverson *Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 240 S 40th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Chenshuang Li *Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 240 S 40th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. lichens@upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6331-6983
Zhong ZhengDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Evgenii ProskurninSchool of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Chun-Hsi ChungDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 240 S 40th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Min ZouKey Laboratory of Shannxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 98 XiWu Road, Xi'an, 710004, China. zoumin@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

American Association of Orthodontists Full-Time Faculty Fellowship AwardAmerican Association of Orthodontists Foundation Orthodontic Faculty Development Fellowship Awardthe Department of Orthodontics, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine the J. Henry O'Hern Jr. Pilot GrantUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine JosephUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine Josephine Rabinowitz Award for Excellence in Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe location of the maxillary sinus significantly affects the orthodontic treatment, particularly when temporary anchorage devices (TADs) are taking place. The current study aims to evaluate the maxillary sinus size and location in a skeletal class II population. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe pre-orthodontic treatment CBCT images of the skeletal class II population were selected. The sinus's volumetric size, height, width, and depth were measured and compared among different skeletal vertical patterns and between genders. In addition, the height and width of the alveolar bone surrounding the maxillary sinus floor were quantified in the same manner.

resultsPatients who displayed a high-angle skeletal pattern had significantly greater maxillary sinus dimensions, shorter vertical distance between the maxillary sinus floor and the alveolar bone crest, and thinner alveolar bone surrounding the maxillary sinus. Meanwhile, the maxillary sinus dimension measurements were positively correlated with the SN-MP angle in both genders but only correlated with ANB angle in females. On the other hand, the vertical distance between the maxillary sinus floor and the alveolar bone crest was negatively correlated with the SN-MP angle in males but the ANB angle in females.

conclusionsIn the skeletal class II population, the high-angle patients faced a higher risk of maxillary sinus perforations by TADs. In addition, gender-related variations were noticed warranting clinical attention, as males have a higher potential for maxillary sinus penetration from TAD placement than females. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Maxillary posterior alveolar TADs are often prescribed to achieve the distalization of maxillary posterior teeth in class II patients. The current study provided more insight into the "safe zone" for TAD placement related to the maxillary sinus.

Indexed as

Maxillary SinusSinus Floor AugmentationAlveolar ProcessCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMaxillaCBCTMaxillary sinusSex as a biological variable (SABV)Skeletal class IISkeletal vertical pattern

Identifiers

PMID35359186
OpenAlexW4220992915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.