Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359137›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2022

Barotrauma in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a retrospective case-control study.

Vineeta Venkateswaran, Kapil Soni, Apoorv Chaturvedi Chaturvedi, Richa Aggarwal, Venkata Ganesh, Nishant Patel, Rakesh Kumar, Kelika Prakash, Yudhyavir Singh, Abhishek Singh and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vineeta VenkateswaranAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
Kapil SoniJPN Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
Apoorv Chaturvedi ChaturvediAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
Richa AggarwalJPN Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
Venkata GaneshAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
Nishant PatelAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
Rakesh KumarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
Kelika PrakashAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
Yudhyavir SinghJPN Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
Abhishek SinghAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
Shailendra KumarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
Naveet WigAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
Anjan TrikhaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increased incidence of barotrauma in COVID-19 patients, probably due to disease pathology, oxygen therapy and coughing. We aimed to retrospectively compare the characteristics, associations and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with and without barotrauma in the intensive care unit (ICU).

methodsAll adults admitted between October 1st and December 31st 2020 in the ICUs of a COVID-19 hospital were retrospectively analysed for presence of a 'barotrauma event' (presence of at least one of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema or bronchopleural fistula). A control group was formed by matching each case to a patient belonging to the same gender and age range from the remaining patients in the cohort, i.e., those without barotrauma. Demographic details, ICU stay details, details of oxygen therapy and ventilation, and outcomes were noted and compared.

resultsOf 827 patients, 30 patients (3.6%) developed barotrauma events. The typical patient was middle aged (median age 55.5 years) and male (73.3%). The mortality rate was significantly higher in the barotrauma group (83.3% vs. 43.3%, P < 0.001), and odds of survival decreased by 85% if barotrauma occurred (OR 0.15; 95% CI: 0.46-0.51). Patients who developed barotrauma spent a longer time on a high-flow nasal cannula (median 6.7 vs. 1.73 days, P = 0.04), and mechanical ventilation (median 9.54 vs. 0.867 days, P < 0.001), and had a longer ICU stay (median 15.5 vs. 9 days, P = 0.014). The most common event was pneumothorax (26/30).

conclusionsBarotrauma in the COVID-19 ICU is associated with prolonged ICU stay, higher odds of mortality and longer duration spent on mechanical ventilation and a high-flow nasal cannula. Key words: barotrauma, ICU, COVID-19, mortality, pneumothorax.

Indexed as

BarotraumaCOVID-19AdultCase-Control StudiesCritical IllnessHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesbarotraumaCOVID-19ICUmortalitypneumothorax.

Identifiers

PMID35359137
PMCPMC10156483
OpenAlexW4226250620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.