Killifish switch towards mammalian-like regeneration upon aging.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Fibrotic scarring prevents optic nerve regeneration despite preserved axonal growth potential in adult killifish.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026
   Article
2. Early-life growth and cellular heterogeneity in the short-lived African turquoise killifish telencephalon.Biology open · 2025
   Article
3. Differential retinal ganglion cell resilience to optic nerve injury across vertebrate species.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025
   Article
4. The African Turquoise Killifish: A Scalable Vertebrate Model for Aging and Other Complex Phenotypes.Cold Spring Harbor protocols · 2024
   Article
5. Rapid and precise genome engineering in a naturally short-lived vertebrate.eLife · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as