Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35358755›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology. Glaucoma

The 24-2 Visual Field Guided Progression Analysis Can Miss the Progression of Glaucomatous Damage of the Macula Seen Using OCT.

Donald C Hood, Sol La Bruna, Emmanouil Tsamis, Ari Leshno, Bruna Melchior, Jennifer Grossman, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Carlos Gustavo De Moraes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology. Glaucoma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Targeted perimetry for mapping the shape of glaucomatous arcuate scotomata.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  6. A Model of Progression to Help Identify Macular Damage Due to Glaucoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Donald C HoodDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York; Department of Ophthalmology, Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: dch3@columbia.edu.
Sol La BrunaDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Emmanouil TsamisDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Ari LeshnoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Bruna MelchiorDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jennifer GrossmanSUNY Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, New York.
Jeffrey M LiebmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Carlos Gustavo De MoraesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.

Funding

Tests of Models of Retinal/Optic Nerve Diseases&AdaptionR01EY002115 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HOOD, DONALD C. · 1985 to 2018
$7.4M
Structural and Functional Progression of Glaucomatous Damage to the MaculaR01EY025253 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DE MORAES, CARLOS GUSTAVO · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002115NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo better understand the efficacy of the 24-2 guided progression analysis (GPA) in the detection of progression in eyes with early glaucoma (i.e., 24-2 mean deviation [MD] better than -6 dB) by comparing 24-2 GPA with a reference standard (RS) based on a combination of OCT and 24-2 and 10-2 visual field (VF) information.

designCross-sectional study.

participantsNinety-nine eyes from 99 individuals, including 70 suspected or early glaucomatous eyes (24-2 MD better than -6 dB) and 29 healthy controls (HCs).

methodsAll the eyes had at least 4 OCT and VF test dates over a period that ranged from 12 to 59 months. The 24-2 VF tests included 2 baseline tests and at least 2 follow-up tests. The 2 baseline tests were performed within an average of 5.6 days (median, 7 days), and the last follow-up test was performed at least 1 year after the first baseline visit.

main outcome measuresA commercial 24-2 GPA software, with default settings, characterized the eyes as having "likely progression" (LP) or "possible progression" (PP); both were considered "progressing" for this analysis. For RS, 3 authors graded progression using strict criteria and a combination of a custom OCT progression report and commercial 24-2 and 10-2 GPA reports for the same test dates as GPA.

resultsThe reference standard identified 10 (14%) of the 70 patient eyes and none of the HC eyes as having progression. The 24-2 guided progression analysis identified 13 of the 70 patient eyes as having progression (PP or LP). However, it correctly classified only 4 (40%) of the 10 RS progressors. All 6 of the RS progressors missed by the 24-2 GPA showed progression in the macula. In addition, the 24-2 GPA identified 2 of the 29 HC eyes as progressors and 9 patient eyes without progression based on the RS.

conclusionsIn eyes with early glaucoma (i.e., 24-2 MD, > -6 dB) in this study, the 24-2 GPA missed progression seen using OCT and exhibited a relatively high rate of false positives. Furthermore, the region progressing typically included the macula. The results suggest that including OCT and/or 10-2 VFs should improve the detection of progression.

Indexed as

GlaucomaOptic DiskCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionHumansIntraocular PressureRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual FieldsGlaucomaOCTPerimetryProgression

Identifiers

PMID35358755
PMCPMC9515237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.