Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35358592›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmology2022

Bevacizumab in High-Risk Corneal Transplantation: A Pilot Multicenter Prospective Randomized Control Trial.

Thomas H Dohlman, Matthew McSoley, Francisco Amparo, Tatiana Carreno-Galeano, Mengyu Wang, Mohammad Dastjerdi, Rohan Bir Singh, Giulia Coco, Antonio Di Zazzo, Hasanain Shikari and 14 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ocular Lymphatics in Health and Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Available Therapeutic Options for Corneal Neovascularization: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas H DohlmanCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Matthew McSoleyCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Francisco AmparoCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tatiana Carreno-GaleanoCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mengyu WangCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mohammad DastjerdiCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
Rohan Bir SinghCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Giulia CocoCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Antonio Di ZazzoCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hasanain ShikariCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ujwala SabooCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kimberly SippelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Jessica CiralskyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Sonia H YooBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Matheus SticcaCornea and External Disease Service, Paulista Medical School/Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tais H WakamatsuCornea and External Disease Service, Paulista Medical School/Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Somasheila MurthyCornea Service, The Cornea Institute, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Pedram HamrahCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Cornea Service, New England Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ula JurkunasCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Joseph B CiolinoCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jose A P GomesCornea and External Disease Service, Paulista Medical School/Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Victor L PerezBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; Foster Center for Ocular Immunology, Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Jia YinCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Reza DanaCornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: Reza_Dana@meei.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRCornell University · USUniversity of Miami · USL V Prasad Eye Institute · INRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USTufts University · US

Funding

Mass Eye and Ear-Vision Clinical Scientist Development ProgramK12EY016335 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI Reza Dana · 2004 to 2026
$12.3M
Local regulation and deletion of T cells to induce tolerance and establish long-term survival of high-risk corneal transplantsR01EY030283 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Robert Benjamin Levy, Victor L Perez · 2020 to 2026
$3.1M
The Fibrosis-Immunity Interface in Corneal TransplantationK08EY031759 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI DOHLMAN, THOMAS · 2020 to 2024
$1.2M
Mechanisms of Neuroregulation of Corneal AngiogenesisK08EY031340 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI YIN, JIA · 2020 to 2022
$756k
NEI NIH HHS K08 EY031340NEI NIH HHS K08 EY031759NEI NIH HHS K12 EY016335NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the efficacy of local (subconjunctival and topical) bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment in patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation.

designPilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted at 5 clinical centers in the United States, India, and Brazil.

participantsPatients aged > 18 years undergoing high-risk penetrating keratoplasty, defined as corneal neovascularization (NV) in 1 or more quadrants ≥2 mm from the limbus or extension of corneal NV to the graft-host junction in a previously failed graft.

methodsPatients were randomized to receive subconjunctival bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) or placebo at the time of surgery, followed by topical bevacizumab (10 mg/ml) or topical placebo, administered 4 times per day for 4 weeks.

main outcome measureThe 52-week endothelial immune rejection rate.

resultsNinety-two patients were randomized to receive bevacizumab (n = 48) or control (n = 44). The 52-week endothelial rejection rate was 10% in the bevacizumab group and 19% in the control group (P = 0.20). Post hoc, extended follow-up at the lead study site showed an endothelial rejection rate of 3% in the bevacizumab group and 38% in the control group (P = 0.003). Treatment with bevacizumab was found to have a hazard ratio of 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.65, P = 0.01) in a post hoc Cox regression analysis.

conclusionsIn patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of endothelial rejection at 1 year in the bevacizumab treatment group compared with the control group. This study may have been underpowered to detect a difference between treatment groups, and taken together, our data suggest that, in the current trial design, bevacizumab has a positive but not (yet) significant effect on endothelial rejection.

Indexed as

Corneal NeovascularizationCorneal TransplantationAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabHumansProspective StudiesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesisCorneal transplantationNeovascularizationPenetrating keratoplastyVascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID35358592
PMCPMC10742165
OpenAlexW4220923807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.