Trial reportThe Lancet. Haematology2022
Addition of four doses of rituximab to standard induction chemotherapy in adult patients with precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (UKALL14): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Haematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute leukemia, version 2.0.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Guideline
- American Society of Hematology 2026 guidelines for frontline management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and young adults.Blood advances · 2026Guideline
- Patient-Reported Outcomes in Phase 3 Clinical Trials for Blood Cancers: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Rituximab administration in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Leukemia · 2023Trial
- Rituximab plus multiagent chemotherapy for newly diagnosed CD20-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a prospective phase II study.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2023Trial
- Article
- Long-term follow-up of a pediatric regimen for AYA with Ph-negative ALL: 10-year survival of CALGB 10403 (alliance).Blood advances · 2026Article
- CD20 expression dynamics in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and impact on anti-CD20 treatment.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Observational
- SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Incorporating Immunotherapy into Upfront Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Therapy.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2026Review
- Outcomes of allogeneic stem cell transplant in adult Philadelphia negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with the pediatric-inspired GIMEMA 1913 protocol. A Campus ALL study.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Article
- Heterozygous germline TET2 loss-of-function variants associated with an ALPS-like phenotype.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Review
- Advances and challenges in leukemia treatment: A focus on monoclonal antibodies and emerging therapies.Oncology research · 2025Review
- The efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 antibody for the treatment of B-ALL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2025Review
- From data extraction to analysis: a comparative study of ELISE capabilities in scientific literature.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Ph- ALL: immunotherapy in upfront treatment.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024Review
- A Case of B-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma Presenting with an Isolated Epidural Mass Treated Successfully with Radiotherapy Followed by United Kingdom Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (UKALL) Chemotherapy Protocol.Hematology reports · 2024Article
- Frontline Ph-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment and the emerging role of blinatumomab.Blood cancer journal · 2024Review
- Prediction of Response to FDA-Approved Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).Current treatment options in oncology · 2024Review
- Naked antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates: targeted therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Haematologica · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTreatment for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia requires improvement. UKALL14 was a UK National Cancer Research Institute Adult ALL group study that aimed to determine the benefit of adding the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab, to the therapy of adults with de novo B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
methodsThis was an investigator-initiated, phase 3, randomised controlled trial done in all UK National Health Service Centres treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (65 centres). Patients were aged 25-65 years with de-novo BCR-ABL1-negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Patients with de-novo BCR-ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia were eligible if they were aged 19-65 years. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to standard-of-care induction therapy or standard-of-care induction therapy plus four doses of intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m
findingsBetween April 19, 2012, and July 10, 2017, 586 patients were randomly assigned to standard of care (n=292) or standard of care plus rituximab (n=294). Nine patients were excluded from the final analysis due to misdiagnosis (standard of care n=4, standard of care plus rituximab n=5). In the standard-of-care group, median age was 45 years (IQR 22-65), 159 (55%) of 292 participants were male, 128 (44%) were female, one (<1%) was intersex, and 143 (59%) of 244 participants had high-risk cytogenetics. In the standard-of-care plus rituximab group, median age was 46 years (IQR 23-65), 159 (55%) of 294 participants were male, 130 (45%) were female, and 140 (60%) of 235 participants had high-risk cytogenetics. After a median follow-up of 53·7 months (IQR 40·3-70·4), 3-year event-free survival was 43·7% (95% CI 37·8-49·5) for standard of care versus 51·4% (45·4-57·1) for standard of care plus rituximab (hazard ratio [HR] 0·85 [95% CI 0·69-1·06]; p=0·14). The most common adverse events were infections and cytopenias, with no difference between the groups in the rates of adverse events. There were 11 (4%) fatal (grade 5) events in induction phases 1 and 2 in the standard-of-care group and 13 (5%) events in the standard-of-care plus rituximab group). 3-year non-relapse mortality was 23·7% (95% CI 19·0-29·4) in the standard-of-care group versus 20·6% (16·2-25·9) in the standard-of-care plus rituximab group (HR 0·88 [95% CI 0·62-1·26]; p=0·49).
interpretationStandard of care plus four doses of rituximab did not significantly improve event-free survival over standard of care. Rituximab is beneficial in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia but four doses during induction is likely to be insufficient.
fundingCancer Research UK and Blood Cancer UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.