Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35358402›Full record

ReviewJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2022

Human skeletal muscle size with ultrasound imaging: a comprehensive review.

Masatoshi Naruse, Scott Trappe, Todd A Trappe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masatoshi NaruseHuman Performance Laboratory, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana.
Scott TrappeHuman Performance Laboratory, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana.
Todd A TrappeHuman Performance Laboratory, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-0609-5632

Funding

Skeletal Muscle Health with Aging and Life-Long ExerciseR01AG038576 · NIA · BALL STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TRAPPE, SCOTT · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Single Muscle Fiber Contractile Properties With AgingR01AG018409 · NIA · BALL STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TRAPPE, SCOTT · 2001 to 2005
$1.4M
Analgesics and resistance training in older individualsR01AG020532 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS MED SCIS LTL ROCK · PI TRAPPE, TODD A · 2004 to 2008
$1.4M
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) AG-00831HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) AG-020532HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) AG-038576HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) AG-15486HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) AG-15833HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) AG-18409National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) EC400-NCC9-116National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NNJ04HF72GNational Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NNJ06HF59GNIA NIH HHS R01 AG018409NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020532NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal muscle size is an important factor in assessing adaptation to exercise training and detraining, athletic performance, age-associated atrophy and mobility decline, clinical conditions associated with cachexia, and overall skeletal muscle health. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) are widely accepted as the gold standard methods for skeletal muscle size quantification. However, it is not always feasible to use these methods (e.g., field studies, bedside studies, and large cohort studies). Ultrasound has been available for skeletal muscle examination for more than 50 years and the development, utility, and validity of ultrasound imaging are underappreciated. It is now possible to use ultrasound in situations where MR and CT imaging are not suitable. This review provides a comprehensive summary of ultrasound imaging and human skeletal muscle size assessment. Since the first study in 1968, more than 600 articles have used ultrasound to examine the cross-sectional area and/or volume of 107 different skeletal muscles in more than 27,500 subjects of various ages, health status, and fitness conditions. Data from these studies, supported by decades of technological developments, collectively show that ultrasonography is a valid tool for skeletal muscle size quantification. Considering the wide-ranging connections between human health and function and skeletal muscle mass, the utility of ultrasound imaging will allow it to be employed in research investigations and clinical practice in ways not previously appreciated or considered.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMuscle, SkeletalExerciseHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyskeletal muscle massultrasoundwhole muscle imaging

Identifiers

PMID35358402
PMCPMC9126220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.