Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35358372›Full record

Trial reportArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2022

Adipose-Derived Regenerative Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Hand Dysfunction in Systemic Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Dinesh Khanna, Paul Caldron, Richard W Martin, Suzanne Kafaja, Robert Spiera, Shadi Shahouri, Ankoor Shah, Vivien Hsu, John Ervin, Robert Simms and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Stem cell therapy in systemic sclerosis.Clinical rheumatology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 18 institutions in 2 countries.

Dinesh KhannaUniversity of Michigan Health, Ann Arbor.ORCID 0000-0003-1412-4453
Paul CaldronArizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research, Phoenix.
Richard W MartinMichigan State University, Grand Rapids.ORCID 0000-0002-0411-7519
Suzanne KafajaUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Robert SpieraHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2911-6800
Shadi ShahouriHeartland Research Associates, Wichita, Kansas.
Ankoor ShahDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Vivien HsuRutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
John ErvinAlliance for Multispecialty Research, Kansas City, Missouri.
Robert SimmsBoston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-0101-1807
Robyn T DomsicUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-2765-0922
Virginia SteenMedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Laura K HummersJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Chris DerkUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Maureen MayesUniversity of Texas Houston McGovern Medical School.ORCID 0000-0001-5070-2535
Soumya ChatterjeeCleveland Clinic Orthopedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0003-1498-113X
John VargaNorthwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, and University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Steven KestenSalish Kootenai College, Carlsbad, California.
John K FraserJKF Consulting, San Diego, California.ORCID 0000-0002-5132-3032
Daniel E FurstUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
University of California, Los Angeles · USAlliance for Multispecialty Research (United States) · USBoston University · USCleveland Clinic · USDuke Medical Center · USGeorgetown University · USGrand Rapids Community College · USHeartland Research Associates · USHospital for Special Surgery · USJohns Hopkins University · USLEK Consulting (United States) · USNorthwestern University · USPhoenix Houses of New England · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USSalish Kootenai College · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHand dysfunction is common in systemic sclerosis (SSc). We undertook this study to evaluate the capacity of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) to improve hand function in SSc patients.

methodsThe Scleroderma Treatment with Celution Processed Adipose Derived Regenerative Cells Trial was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of ADRCs, in which ADRCs were obtained from patients with SSc by small-volume adipose tissue harvest, and the fingers of each patient were injected with ADRCs. The primary end point was change in hand function at 24 and 48 weeks, assessed using the Cochin Hand Function Scale (CHFS). One of the secondary end points included the change in Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ DI) at 48 weeks. Separate prespecified analyses were performed for patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and those with limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc).

resultsEighty-eight patients were randomized to receive ADRCs (n = 48 [32 patients with dcSSc and 16 with lcSSc]) or placebo (n = 40 [19 patients with dcSSc and 21 with lcSSc]). Change in hand function according to CHFS score was numerically higher for the ADRC group compared to the placebo group but did not achieve statistical significance (mean ± SD improvement in the CHFS score at 48 weeks 11.0 ± 12.5 versus 8.9 ± 10.5; P = 0.299). For patients with dcSSc, the between-group difference in the CHFS at 48 weeks was 6.3 points (nominal P = 0.069). For the secondary end point, the dcSSc group exhibited a between-group difference of 0.17 points in the HAQ DI (nominal P = 0.044) at 48 weeks. Of the ADRC-treated patients with dcSSc, 52% reported improvement greater than the minimum clinically important difference for both CHFS and HAQ DI compared to 16% in the placebo group (nominal P = 0.016). Small-volume adipose tissue harvest and ADRC treatment were well tolerated.

conclusionWhile the primary end point of this trial was not achieved, efficacy trends were observed in patients with dcSSc. Adipose tissue harvest and ADRC injection were demonstrated to be feasible. Further clinical trials of this intervention in the setting of dcSSc are warranted.

Indexed as

Scleroderma, DiffuseScleroderma, SystemicCell TransplantationHandHumansProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35358372
PMCPMC9544105
OpenAlexW4220938258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.