Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35358289›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2022

Unraveling the molecular determinants of the anti-phagocytic protein cloak of plague bacteria.

Daniel T Peters, Antonio Reifs, Alvaro Alonso-Caballero, Azzeldin Madkour, Helen Waller, Brendan Kenny, Raul Perez-Jimenez, Jeremy H Lakey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Emergence, global dispersal, and local adaptations ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The long and the short of Periscope Proteins.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022
    Review
  11. Cloak of protection.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel T PetersBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5835-195X
Antonio ReifsCIC nanoGUNE BRTA, San Sebastian, Spain.
Alvaro Alonso-CaballeroCIC nanoGUNE BRTA, San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0284-2562
Azzeldin MadkourBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Helen WallerBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Brendan KennyBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1173-6585
Raul Perez-JimenezCIC nanoGUNE BRTA, San Sebastian, Spain.
Jeremy H LakeyBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4646-9085
Newcastle University · GBCIC nanoGUNE · ESIkerbasque · ES

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M018318/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathogenic bacterium Yersina pestis is protected from macrophage engulfment by a capsule like antigen, F1, formed of long polymers of the monomer protein, Caf1. However, despite the importance of this pathogen, the mechanism of protection was not understood. Here we demonstrate how F1 protects the bacteria from phagocytosis. First, we show that Escherichia coli expressing F1 showed greatly reduced adherence to macrophages. Furthermore, the few cells that did adhere remained on the macrophage surface and were not engulfed. We then inserted, by mutation, an "RGDS" integrin binding motif into Caf1. This did not change the number of cells adhering to macrophages but increased the fraction of adherent cells that were engulfed. Therefore, F1 protects in two separate ways, reducing cell adhesion, possibly by acting as a polymer brush, and hiding innate receptor binding sites needed for engulfment. F1 is very robust and we show that E. coli expressing weakened mutant polymers are engulfed like the RGDS mutant. This suggests that innate attachment sites on the native cell surface are exposed if F1 is weakened. Single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) experiments revealed that wild-type F1 displays a very high mechanical stability of 400 pN. However, the mechanical resistance of the destabilised mutants, that were fully engulfed, was only 20% weaker. By only marginally exceeding the mechanical force applied to the Caf1 polymer during phagocytosis it may be that the exceptional tensile strength evolved to resist the forces applied at this stage of engulfment.

Indexed as

PlagueYersinia pestisAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliHumansPolymersAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID35358289
PMCPMC9004762
OpenAlexW4220820660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.