ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2022
Self-assessed Competencies of Clinical Research Professionals and Recommendations for Further Education and Training.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-assessed Competency among Clinical Research Professionals in the Philippines Using the JTF Framework.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- Assessment of competencies of clinical research professionals and proposals to improve clinical research in Portugal.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Constricting Gaps: Protocol development, implementation challenges and lessons learned for theContemporary clinical trials communications · 2024Article
- The competency index for clinical research professionals: a potential tool for competency-based clinical research academic program evaluation.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Conceptualization, development, and early dissemination of eMPACTJournal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Education and training of clinical research professionals and the evolution of the Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Learning Health Systems Research Competencies: A Survey of the Rehabilitation Research Community.Physical therapy · 2023Article
- Implementing a mentoring program for clinical research professionals: A novel professional development initiative for university health research staff.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- An Assessment of Clinical Research Self-Efficacy among Researchers at the Largest Healthcare Institute in Qatar: Recommendations and Future Actions.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency (JTF) conducted a global survey of clinical research professionals requesting respondents to self-assess their competencies in each of the eight domains of its Core Competency Framework version 3.1. The results were analyzed based upon role, years of experience, educational level, professional certification, institutional affiliation, and continuing education participation. Respondents with professional certification self-assessed their competencies in all domains at higher levels than those without professional certification. The survey demonstrated that irrespective of role, experience, or educational level, training curricula in both pre-professional and continuing professional education should include additional content relating to research methods, protocol design, medical product development and regulation, and data management and informatics. These results validate and extend the recommendations of a similar 2016 JTF and other surveys. We further recommend that clinical and translational research organizations and clinical sites assess training needs locally, using both subjective and objective measures of skill and knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35357687What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.