Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35357674›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2022

Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer.

Aaron R Dezube, Lisa Cooper, Emanuele Mazzola, Daniel P Dolan, Daniel N Lee, Suden Kucukak, Luis E De Leon, Clark Dumontier, Bayonle Ademola, Emily Polhemus and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron R DezubeDivision of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA. adezube@partners.org.
Lisa CooperDivision of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Emanuele MazzolaDivision of Data Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Daniel P DolanDivision of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Daniel N LeeDivision of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Suden KucukakDivision of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Luis E De LeonDivision of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Clark DumontierDivision of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Bayonle AdemolaDivision of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Emily PolhemusDivision of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Raphael BuenoDivision of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Abby WhiteDivision of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Scott J SwansonDivision of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Michael T JaklitschDivision of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Laura FrainDivision of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jon O WeeDivision of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USVA Boston Healthcare System · US

Funding

Translational Researchin Aging Trainnig ProgramT32AG023480 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI LIPSITZ, LEWIS · 2004 to 2024
$7.6M
CSRD VA IK2 CX002218NIA NIH HHS T32 AG023480NIA NIH HHS T32AG023480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatterns of overall and disease-free survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in older adults have not been carefully studied.

methodsRetrospective analysis of all patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at our institution was performed. Differences in outcomes were stratified by age groups, < 75 and ≥ 75 years old, and two time periods, 2005-2012 and 2013-2020.

resultsA total of 1135 patients were included: 979 (86.3%) patients were < 75 (86.3%), and 156 (13.7%) were ≥ 75 years old. Younger patients had fewer comorbidities, better nutritional status, and were more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy (all p < 0.05). However, tumor stage and operative approach were similar, except for increased performance of the McKeown technique in younger patients (p = 0.02). Perioperatively, younger patients experienced fewer overall and grade II complications (both p < 0.05). They had better overall survival (log-rank p-value < 0.001) and median survival, 62.2 vs. 21.5 months (p < 0.05). When stratified by pathologic stage, survival was similar for yp0 and pathologic stage II disease (both log-rank p-value > 0.05). Multivariable Cox models showed older age (≥ 75 years old) had increased hazard for reduced overall survival (HR 2.04 95% CI 1.5-2.8; p < 0.001) but not disease-free survival (HR 1.1 95% CI 0.78-1.6; p = 0.54). Over time, baseline characteristics remained largely similar, while stage became more advanced with a rise in neoadjuvant use and increased performance of minimally invasive esophagectomy (all p < 0.05). While overall complication rates improved (p < 0.05), overall and recurrence-free survival did not. Overall survival was better in younger patients during both time periods (both log-rank p < 0.05).

conclusionsDespite similar disease-free survival rates, long-term survival was decreased in older adults as compared to younger patients. This may be related to unmeasured factors including frailty, long-term complications after surgery, and competing causes of death. However, our results suggest that survival is similar in those with complete pathologic responses.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyAgedHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEsophagectomyOlder adultsOutcomesRecurrenceSurvival

Identifiers

PMID35357674
PMCPMC9474270
OpenAlexW4221043392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.