Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35357604›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular drugs and therapy2023

An Updated Review on the Role of Non-dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers and Beta-blockers in Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Evidence and Gaps.

Jeffrey Triska, Juan Tamargo, Biykem Bozkurt, Uri Elkayam, Addison Taylor, Yochai Birnbaum

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Run baby run … but not too fast! Rate control management in atrial fibrillation: a claim for personalization.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey TriskaDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. u233989@bcm.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4476-7994
Juan TamargoDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology School of Medicine, Institute Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Biykem BozkurtDepartment of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Uri ElkayamDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Addison TaylorDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Yochai BirnbaumDepartment of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · USHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Comunidad de Madrid B2017/BMD-3738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines on acute and chronic heart failure (HF) recommend that non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NDCC) should be avoided in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. It also emphasizes that beta-blockers only be initiated in clinically stable, euvolemic patients. Despite these recommendations, NDCC and beta-blockers are often still employed in patients with AF with rapid ventricular response and acute decompensated HF. The relative safety and efficacy of these therapies in this setting is unclear.

methodsTo address the question of the safety and efficacy of NDCC and beta-blockers for acute rate control in decompensated HF, we provide a perspective on the literature of NDCC and beta-blockers in chronic HF with reduced and preserved ejection fraction and AF, including trials on the management of AF with rapid ventricular response with and without HF.

resultsRobust data demonstrates mortality benefits when beta-blockers are used in patients with chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction. The data that inform the contraindication of NDCC in HF with reduced ejection fraction are outdated and were not primarily designed to address the efficacy and safety of rate control of AF in patients with HF. Several studies indicate that for acute rate control, NDCC and beta-blockers are both efficacious therapies, especially in the setting of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy.

conclusionFuture studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of beta-blockers and NDCC in both acute and chronic AF with HF with reduced and preserved ejection fraction.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationHeart FailureVentricular Dysfunction, LeftAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCalcium Channel BlockersChronic DiseaseHumansStroke VolumeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCalcium Channel BlockersAcute decompensated heart failureAtrial fibrillationBeta-blockersCalcium channel blockersHeart failureRapid ventricular response

Identifiers

PMID35357604
OpenAlexW4220908279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.