Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35357564›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2022

Novel insights into the effects of levodopa on the up- and downstrokes of writing sequences.

Sanne Broeder, Leonardo Boccuni, Britt Vandendoorent, Geert Verheyden, Raf Meesen, Alice Nieuwboer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sanne BroederDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, bus 1501, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium. sanne.broeder@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0891-3264
Leonardo BoccuniInstitut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a la UAB, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-5219
Britt VandendoorentDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, bus 1501, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6071-8629
Geert VerheydenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, bus 1501, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3095-8175
Raf MeesenDepartment of Kinesiology, Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7938-3758
Alice NieuwboerDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, bus 1501, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1193-6229
KU Leuven · BEHasselt University · BEUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor control of automatized and overlearned sequences, such as writing, is affected in Parkinson's disease (PD), impacting patients' daily life. Medication effects on motor performance are not only task-specific, but also variable within tasks. The nature of this variance is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether medication affects writing sequences differently when producing up- or downstrokes. Writing was assessed in healthy controls (HC) (N = 31) and PD (N = 32), when ON and OFF medication in a randomized order (interspersed by two months). Subjects wrote a sequential pattern with an increasing size on a digital tablet. Writing outcomes were movement vigor (amplitude and velocity), error and end-point variability, and sequence continuation, calculated separately for up- and downstrokes. Results showed that PD patients OFF-medication reduced movement vigor (amplitude) for up- and downstrokes compared to HC. Clear deficits were found for up- but not for downstroke error in PD patients in OFF, suggesting a directional bias. Dopaminergic medication improved motor vigor by increasing writing amplitude and upstroke continuation, but this occurred at the cost of the downstroke trajectory. Other writing outcomes did not improve with medication intake. In conclusion, we interpret these findings as that the impact of dopamine is complex, highly task-specific, supporting the most highly energy demanding components of a writing sequence. As medication did not regulate downstroke writing, we recommend supplementary training to address task demands that were less modulated by dopamine (registration: https://osf.io/gk5q8/ , 17 July 2018).

Indexed as

LevodopaParkinson DiseaseDopamineDopamine AgentsHumansWritingDopamineDopamine AgentsLevodopaDopaminergic medicationDysgraphiaHandwritingMotor controlParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID35357564
OpenAlexW4220846146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.