ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2022
Novel insights into the effects of levodopa on the up- and downstrokes of writing sequences.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of task-specific home-based touchscreen training in people with Parkinson's disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances motor learning in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of neurology · 2023Trial
- Micrographia in Parkinson's Disease: Automatic Recognition through Artificial Intelligence.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Construct validity, intrarater and interrater reliability of the Italian version of the systematic screening of handwriting difficulties (SOS) test in people with Parkinson's disease.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor control of automatized and overlearned sequences, such as writing, is affected in Parkinson's disease (PD), impacting patients' daily life. Medication effects on motor performance are not only task-specific, but also variable within tasks. The nature of this variance is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether medication affects writing sequences differently when producing up- or downstrokes. Writing was assessed in healthy controls (HC) (N = 31) and PD (N = 32), when ON and OFF medication in a randomized order (interspersed by two months). Subjects wrote a sequential pattern with an increasing size on a digital tablet. Writing outcomes were movement vigor (amplitude and velocity), error and end-point variability, and sequence continuation, calculated separately for up- and downstrokes. Results showed that PD patients OFF-medication reduced movement vigor (amplitude) for up- and downstrokes compared to HC. Clear deficits were found for up- but not for downstroke error in PD patients in OFF, suggesting a directional bias. Dopaminergic medication improved motor vigor by increasing writing amplitude and upstroke continuation, but this occurred at the cost of the downstroke trajectory. Other writing outcomes did not improve with medication intake. In conclusion, we interpret these findings as that the impact of dopamine is complex, highly task-specific, supporting the most highly energy demanding components of a writing sequence. As medication did not regulate downstroke writing, we recommend supplementary training to address task demands that were less modulated by dopamine (registration: https://osf.io/gk5q8/ , 17 July 2018).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.