Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35357536›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Probability maps classify ischemic stroke regions more accurately than CT perfusion summary maps.

Daan Peerlings, Fasco van Ommen, Edwin Bennink, Jan W Dankbaar, Birgitta K Velthuis, Bart J Emmer, Jan W Hoving, Charles B L M Majoie, Henk A Marquering, Hugo W A M de Jong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daan PeerlingsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584CX, The Netherlands. d.peerlings@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8134-2824
Fasco van OmmenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584CX, The Netherlands.
Edwin BenninkDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584CX, The Netherlands.
Jan W DankbaarDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584CX, The Netherlands.
Birgitta K VelthuisDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584CX, The Netherlands.
Bart J EmmerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, 1105AZ, The Netherlands.
Jan W HovingDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, 1105AZ, The Netherlands.
Charles B L M MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, 1105AZ, The Netherlands.
Henk A MarqueringDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, 1105AZ, The Netherlands.
Hugo W A M de JongDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584CX, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare single parameter thresholding with multivariable probabilistic classification of ischemic stroke regions in the analysis of computed tomography perfusion (CTP) parameter maps.

methodsPatients were included from two multicenter trials and were divided into two groups based on their modified arterial occlusive lesion grade. CTP parameter maps were generated with three methods-a commercial method (ISP), block-circulant singular value decomposition (bSVD), and non-linear regression (NLR). Follow-up non-contrast CT defined the follow-up infarct region. Conventional thresholds for individual parameter maps were established with a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Probabilistic classification was carried out with a logistic regression model combining the available CTP parameters into a single probability.

resultsA total of 225 CTP data sets were included, divided into a group of 166 patients with successful recanalization and 59 with persistent occlusion. The precision and recall of the CTP parameters were lower individually than when combined into a probability. The median difference [interquartile range] in mL between the estimated and follow-up infarct volume was 29/23/23 [52/50/52] (ISP/bSVD/NLR) for conventional thresholding and was 4/6/11 [31/25/30] (ISP/bSVD/NLR) for the probabilistic classification.

conclusionsMultivariable probability maps outperform thresholded CTP parameter maps in estimating the infarct lesion as observed on follow-up non-contrast CT. A multivariable probabilistic approach may harmonize the classification of ischemic stroke regions. KEY POINTS: • Combining CTP parameters with a logistic regression model increases the precision and recall in estimating ischemic stroke regions. • Volumes following from a probabilistic analysis predict follow-up infarct volumes better than volumes following from a threshold-based analysis. • A multivariable probabilistic approach may harmonize the classification of ischemic stroke regions.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaIschemic StrokeStrokeCerebrovascular CirculationHumansInfarctionPerfusionPerfusion ImagingProbabilityTomography, X-Ray ComputedBrain ischemiaLogistic modelsPerfusion imagingStrokeTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID35357536
PMCPMC9381605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.