Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35357511›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2022

Optimization of hippocampus sparing during whole brain radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost-tutorial and efficacy of complete directional hippocampal blocking.

Ilinca Popp, Anca Ligia Grosu, Jamina Tara Fennell, Melissa Fischer, Dimos Baltas, Rolf Wiehle

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilinca PoppDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. ilinca.popp@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6702-3619
Anca Ligia GrosuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Jamina Tara FennellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Melissa FischerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Dimos BaltasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Rolf WiehleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHippocampus-avoidance whole brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (HA-WBRT+SIB) is a complex treatment option for patients with multiple brain metastases, aiming to prevent neurocognitive decline and simultaneously increase tumor control. Achieving efficient hippocampal dose reduction in this context can be challenging. The aim of the current study is to present and analyze the efficacy of complete directional hippocampal blocking in reducing the hippocampal dose during HA-WBRT+SIB.

methodsA total of 30 patients with multiple metastases having undergone HA-WBRT+SIB were identified. The prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 12 fractions to the whole brain, with 98% of the hippocampus receiving ≤ 9 Gy and 2% ≤ 17 Gy and with SIB to metastases/resection cavities of 36-51 Gy in 12 fractions. Alternative treatment plans were calculated using complete directional hippocampal blocking and compared to conventional plans regarding target coverage, homogeneity, conformity, dose to hippocampi and organs at risk.

resultsAll alternative plans reached prescription doses. Hippocampal blocking enabled more successful sparing of the hippocampus, with a mean dose of 8.79 ± 0.99 Gy compared to 10.07 ± 0.96 Gy in 12 fractions with the conventional method (p < 0.0001). The mean dose to the whole brain (excluding metastases and hippocampal avoidance region) was 30.52 ± 0.80 Gy with conventional planning and 30.28 ± 0.11 Gy with hippocampal blocking (p = 0.11). Target coverage, conformity and homogeneity indices for whole brain and metastases, as well as doses to organs at risk were similar between planning methods (p > 0.003).

conclusionComplete directional hippocampal blocking is an efficient method for achieving improved hippocampal sparing during HA-WBRT+SIB.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedCranial IrradiationHippocampusHumansOrgans at RiskOrgan Sparing TreatmentsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedBrain metastasesCognitive functionRadiotherapy planningToxicityWBRT

Identifiers

PMID35357511
PMCPMC9165264
OpenAlexW4221068942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.