Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35357469›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

PARPs: All for One and One for All? Enhancing Diversity in Clinical Trials.

Shibani Nicum, Sarah P Blagden

Abstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shibani NicumDepartment of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah P BlagdenDepartment of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8783-3491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PARP inhibitors have revolutionized the management of ovarian cancer and are being licensed for other cancer indications. The clinical trials prompting licensing decisions in ovarian cancer were dominated by White participants, or participant ethnicity was not documented. To compensate for this, replicative studies like L-MOCA can be run in specific ethnic groups. In the future, strategies such as mandatory collection and publication of race and ethnicity data are essential alongside concerted efforts to widen the inclusivity of trial recruitment. See related article by Gao et al., p. 2278.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsPhthalazinesCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.