Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35357356›Full record

ArticleMedicine2022

Effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of plantar fasciitis.

Alper Kurtoglu, Alauddin Kochai, Mustafa Erkan Inanmaz, Erhan Sukur, Dogan Keskin, Mehmet Türker, Zafer Sen, Ismail Daldal, Laçin Yüksel Avan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Plantar Fasciitis: An Updated Review.Journal of medical ultrasound
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alper KurtogluSakarya University Research and Training Hospital, Adapazari, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5775-102
Alauddin KochaiSakarya University Research and Training Hospital, Adapazari, Sakarya, Turkey.
Mustafa Erkan InanmazSakarya University Research and Training Hospital, Adapazari, Sakarya, Turkey.
Erhan SukurSakarya University Research and Training Hospital, Adapazari, Sakarya, Turkey.
Dogan KeskinSakarya University Research and Training Hospital, Adapazari, Sakarya, Turkey.
Mehmet TürkerSakarya University Research and Training Hospital, Adapazari, Sakarya, Turkey.
Zafer SenUniversity of Health Sciences, Konya City Hospital Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turkey.
Ismail DaldalLokman Hekim Akay Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Ankara, Turkey.
Laçin Yüksel AvanSakarya University Research and Training Hospital, Adapazari, Sakarya, Turkey.
Sakarya University · TRKonya Food and Agriculture University · TRLokman Hekim Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractPlantar fasciitis is the most common cause of heel pain. Pain can be persistent in some patients and interrupt daily activities and sportive activities. There are a lot of treatment options available for plantar fasciitis. We hypothesized that patients with chronic persistent plantar fasciitis can be successfully treated with radiofrequency nerve ablation (RFNA).Two hundred sixty-one patients with plantar fasciitis (378 feet) treated with RFNA from February 2017 to January 2019 were retrospectively assessed. All the patients had plantar heel pain for at least 6months. Based on their body mass index (BMI), the enrolled patients were divided into obese (BMI ≥ 30kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI < 30kg/m2) groups. The patients were asked to complete a questionnaire just before and after the procedure and during the final follow-up. The BNS Radiofrequency Lesion Generator was used during a single session. The patients' information, including their visual analogue scale (VAS) score and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, was assessed. During their final follow-up, the patients were asked to rate the success of their treatment by choosing one of the following options: completely successful, very successful, moderately successful, marginally successful, or not successful.The VAS and AOFAS scores of all the patients were evaluated pre-procedure, in the first month after procedure, and during the final follow-up (8-24 months). There was a statistically significant difference between the pre-procedure and postprocedure VAS scores (P < .001), there was no statistically significant difference between the VAS scores in the first month postprocedure and during the final follow-up.There was a statistically significant difference between the pre-procedure and postprocedure AOFAS scores (P < .001), there was no statistically significant difference between the AOFAS scores in the first month postprocedure and during the final follow-up.RFNA can be used as an alternative method to surgical procedures for treating plantar fasciitis because it is safe and effective. The advantages of RFNA are that patients can quickly return to their work and resume weight-bearing activities.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationFasciitis, PlantarHumansPainPain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35357356
PMCPMC11319323
OpenAlexW4220827218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.