ReviewACS biomaterials science & engineering2022
Digital Light Processing Bioprinting Advances for Microtissue Models.
Review in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering neurovascular thrombosis: Light-based bioprinting for patient-specific modeling and women's cerebrovascular health.Science advances · 2026Review
- Engineering Multiscale Vasculature: Biological Principles, Design Constraints, and Advanced Biofabrication Strategies for Functional Vascular Networks.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Engineering heterogeneous tissues and organs via multi-material bioprinting: Advances, challenges, and opportunities.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- A practical toolbox for modelling fibrosis in vitro.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Accessible Biofabrication of Anatomically Inspired Hollow and Branched Hydrogel Constructs by Soft Templating (Sof-T).Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Digital light processing bioprinting: bioink innovations and applications in tissue and organ regeneration.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- 3D bioprinting of microfluidic systems for cardiac regenerative medicine: from biofabrication to organ-on-a-chip.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- In Situ Characterisation of Hydrogels via Dynamic Interface Printing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Modeling early human heart development using an iPSC-based 3D bioprinted model of embryonic heart tube.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Natural Polymers in Tissue Engineering and Regeneration: Material-Cell Mechanotransduction, Biofabrication Strategies, and Clinical Translation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Soft Robotics and Advanced Technologies for Minimally Invasive Bioprinting: The Future of Internal Organ Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Bioprinting Organs-Science or Fiction?-A Review From Students to Students.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- 3D biofabricated in vitro models as new approach methodologies for animal alternatives.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Unconventional bioprinting modalities for advanced tissue biofabrication.Biomaterials · 2026Review
- Design considerations for photoinitiator selection in cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels.Biomaterials science · 2026Article
- Development of a Tunable Dextran-PCL Biomaterial Photoink for High-Resolution DLP 3D Printing in Biomedical Applications.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Bioprinting for drug screening: A path toward reducing animal testing or redefining preclinical research?Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Supramolecular peptidic dopants for inducing photoconductivity and mechanical tunability in digital light processable hydrogels.Faraday discussions · 2025Article
- Bioprinting Vascularized Constructs for Clinical Relevance: Engineering Hydrogel Systems for Biological Maturity.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Bridging the Gap: Unlocking the Potential of Biofabrication for Applications in In Vitro Testing.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Digital light processing (DLP) bioprinting has been widely introduced as a fast and robust biofabrication method in tissue engineering. The technique holds a great promise for creating tissue models because it can replicate the resolution and complexity of natural tissues and constructs. A DLP system projects 2D images onto layers of bioink using a digital photomask. The resolution of DLP bioprinting strongly depends on the characteristics of the projected light and the photo-cross-linking response of the bioink microenvironment. In this review, we present a summary of DLP fundamentals with a focus on bioink properties, photoinitiator selection, and light characteristics in resolution of bioprinted constructs. A simple guideline is provided for bioengineers interested in using DLP platforms and customizing technical specifications for its design. The literature review reveals the promising future of DLP bioprinting for disease modeling and biofabrication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.